The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organic Matter Dynamics and Carbon Sequestration Rates for a Tillage Chronosequence in a Brazilian Oxisol
Abstract
Amounts and rates of C sequestration under no‐tillage are not known for a major ecological region of south Brazil. These were assessed in a Brazilian Oxisol under a plow and no‐tillage chronosequence located in Paraná State. The chronosequence consisted of six treatments: (i) native field (NF); (ii) 1‐yr plow conversion of native field to cropland (PNF‐1); (iii) no‐tillage for 10 yr (NT‐10); (iv) no‐tillage for 20 yr (NT‐20); (v) no‐tillage for 22 yr (NT‐22); and (vi) conventional tillage for 22 yr (CT‐22). Soil samples were collected from five depths. No‐tillage, compared with the NF treatment, caused a significant increase in soil organic C (SOC) storage. More than 60% of this increase occurred in the 0‐ to 10‐cm soil layer. There was a decrease in the amount of SOC in the CT‐22 compared with the NF soil treatment and 97% of this loss also occurred in the 0‐ to 10‐cm layer. There was a close relationship between the SOC content and the amount of crop residues input ( R 2 = 0.74, P ≤ 0.05). There were increased SOC concentrations in the finer particle‐size fractions (<20 μm) of no‐tillage surface soil compared with the NF or CT‐22 soils. However, the percentage of SOC derived from crop residues in no‐tillage treatments, as assessed by 13C natural abundance (δ), was generally greater in the coarse (>20 μm) than in the finer (<20 μm) particle‐size fractions. The C sequestration rate for no‐tillage was 80.6 g C m −2 yr −1 for the 0‐ to 20‐cm depth and 99.4 g C m −2 yr −1 for the 0‐ to 40‐cm depth. The no‐tillage C sequestration potential for South Brazil was estimated as 9.37 Tg C yr −1
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils
TISDALL, J. M., & OADES, J. M. (1982) · Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x · Cited by 6,267
Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world
BATJES, N. H. (1996) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.x · Cited by 3,213
Soil structure and carbon cycling
Golchin, A., Oades, J., Skjemstad, J., & Clarke, P. (1994) · Australian Journal of Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr9941043 · Cited by 669
Crop Rotation and Tillage Effects on Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen
Havlin, J. L., Kissel, D. E., Maddux, L. D., Claassen, M. M., & Long, J. H. (1990) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400020026x · Cited by 652
Cited by
Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security
Lal, R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1097396 · Cited by 8,376
Self-citationSoil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change
Lal, R. (2004) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032 · Cited by 3,936
Self-citationDON, A., SCHUMACHER, J., & FREIBAUER, A. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02336.x · Cited by 1,477
Lal, R. (2006) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.696 · Cited by 894
Self-citationLal, R., Negassa, W., & Lorenz, K. (2015) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.09.002 · Cited by 580
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- de M. Sá, J. C., Cerri, C. C., Dick, W. A., Lal, R., Filho, S. P. V., Piccolo, M. C., & Feigl, B. E.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1486-1499
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W1973003103
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organic Matter Dynamics and Carbon Sequestration Rates for a Tillage Chronosequence in a Brazilian Oxisol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2001.6551486x
- The paper
- de M. Sá, J. C., Cerri, C. C., Dick, W. A., Lal, R., Filho, S. P. V., Piccolo, M. C., & Feigl, B. E. (2001). Organic Matter Dynamics and Carbon Sequestration Rates for a Tillage Chronosequence in a Brazilian Oxisol. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.6551486x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.