Cited by 652Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Management and Crop YieldAgricultural Science and Fertilization

Crop Rotation and Tillage Effects on Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen

Havlin, J. L., Kissel, D. E., Maddux, L. D., Claassen, M. M., Long, J. H.·1990·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

Sustaining or increasing soil productivity depends in part on soil and crop management practices that maintain or increase soil organic matter. This study was conducted to determine the effects of tillage, crop rotation, and fertilizer N on soil organic C and N. Two long‐term tillage/rotation studies and one long‐term rotation/N‐rate study were conducted on eastern Kansas soils. Soils were sampled from conventional (CT) and no‐tillage (NT) treatments applied to continuous sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] (S/S), continuous soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] (B/B), and sorghum‐soybean (S/B) rotations in the tillage/rotation studies and from the 0 and 252 kg N ha−1 treatments on continuous corn (Zea mays L.) (C/C), B/B, and corn‐soybean (C/B) rotations in the rotation/N‐rate study. Organic C and N were determined on soils sampled at depths of 0 to 2.5, 2.5 to 7.5, 7.5 to 15, and 15 to 30 cm. Compared with CT, NT had greater organic C and N contents. Compared with B/B, S/B and S/S increased orgnaic C and N under NT and, to a lesser extent, under CT (at 0‐2.5‐cm depth). Increases in organic C and N with NT compared with CT and with sorghum rotations compared with B/B were directly related to the quantity of residue produced and left on the soil surface (S/S > S/B / > B/B). Fertilizer N increased soil organic C and N only slightly. Crop management systems that include rotations with high residue‐producing crops and maintenance of surface residue cover with reduced tillage result in greater soil organic C and N, which may improve soil productivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400020026x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Monoculture corn has been observed to have higher SOC than corn-soybean rotation.

    “Monoculture corn has been observed to have higher SOC than corn-soybean rotation (Havlin et al. 1990, Studdert and Echeverria 2000, West and Post 2002) since soybean provides less residue input to the soil than corn.”

    From LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF NET GREENHOUSE-GAS FLUX FOR BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS (2007) · cites this paper as Havlin et al. 1990

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Havlin, J. L., Kissel, D. E., Maddux, L. D., Claassen, M. M., & Long, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Kansas State University (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Kansas River Valley Exp. Field Topeka KS 66618
  • Harvey Co. Exp. Field Hesston KS 67062
  • Cornbelt Exp. Field Powhattan KS 66527
Corresponding author
Havlin, J. L.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-03
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
448-452
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2000291905
Cited by
652
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 23
FWCI
17.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Science Society of America Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
crop rotation, tillage, no-tillage, conventional tillage, soil organic carbon, soil organic nitrogen, fertilizer nitrogen, crop residues, sorghum, soybean, maize, continuous cropping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review