The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inorganic Carbon Analysis by Modified Pressure-Calcimeter Method
Abstract
Soil organic C (SOC) analyses using high temperature induction furnace combustion methods have become increasing popular because of advances in instrumentation. Combustion methods, however, also include C from CaCO3 and CaMg(CO3)2 found in calcareous soils. Separate analysis of the inorganic C (IC) must be done to correct C data from combustion methods. Our objective was to develop a efficient and precise IC method by modification of the pressure-calcimeter method. We modified the method by using Wheaton serum bottles (20-mL and 100-mL) sealed with butyl rubber stoppers and aluminum tear-off seals as the reaction vessel and a pressure transducer monitored by a digital voltmeter. Our gravimetric IC determination of six soils showed a strong correlation when regressed against IC from the modified pressure-calcimeter method (slope of 0.99, r2 = 0.998). The method detection limit (MDL) was 0.17 g IC kg−1 for the 20-mL serum bottles and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.30 g IC kg−1 The 100-mL serum bottle had a MDL of 0.42 with a LOQ of 2.4 g IC kg−1 When using a 100-mL Wheaton serum bottle as the reaction vessel with a 0.50-g sample size, soils containing up to 120 g IC kg−1, which represent a 100 % CaCO3 equivalent, can be analyzed within the V output range of the pressure transducer. Soil organic C determined by subtraction of IC from total C from combustion analysis correlated well with SOC determined by the Walkley-Black.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter
Nelson, D. W., & Sommers, L. E. (1996) · SSSA Book Series · doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c34 · Cited by 10,491
Loeppert, R. H., & Suarez, D. L. (1996) · SSSA Book Series · doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c15 · Cited by 834
Agroecosystem Approach to Soil and Crop Management Research
Peterson, G. A., Westfall, D. G., & Cole, C. V. (1993) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700050032x · Cited by 165
Self-citation
Cited by
Effect of biochar on chemical properties of acidic soil
Chintala, R., Mollinedo, J., Schumacher, T. E., Malo, D. D., & Julson, J. L. (2014) · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science · doi:10.1080/03650340.2013.789870 · Cited by 538
Soil Carbon Saturation: Linking Concept and Measurable Carbon Pools
Stewart, C. E., Plante, A. F., Paustian, K., Conant, R. T., & Six, J. (2008) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2007.0104 · Cited by 351
Biochar and Manure Affect Calcareous Soil and Corn Silage Nutrient Concentrations and Uptake
Lentz, R. D., & Ippolito, J. A. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2011.0126 · Cited by 230
Impact of Nitrogen Fertilization and Cropping System on Carbon Sequestration in Midwestern Mollisols
Russell, A. E., Laird, D. A., Parkin, T. B., & Mallarino, A. P. (2005) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2005.0413 · Cited by 213
Lee, D. K., Owens, V. N., & Doolittle, J. J. (2007) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2006.0152 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Sherrod, L. A., Dunn, G., Peterson, G. A., & Kolberg, R. L.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 299
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W1989112421
- Cited by
- 614
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inorganic Carbon Analysis by Modified Pressure-Calcimeter Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2002.0299
- The paper
- Sherrod, L. A., Dunn, G., Peterson, G. A., & Kolberg, R. L. (2002). Inorganic Carbon Analysis by Modified Pressure-Calcimeter Method. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.0299
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.