The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Competitive Adsorption of Arsenate and Arsenite on Oxides and Clay Minerals
Abstract
Arsenic adsorption on amorphous Al and Fe oxides and the clay minerals, kaolinite, montmorillonite, and illite was investigated as a function of solution pH and As redox state, i.e., arsenite [As(III)] and arsenate [As(V)]. Arsenic adsorption experiments were carried out in batch systems to determine adsorption envelopes, amount of As(III), As(V), or both adsorbed as a function of solution pH per fixed total As concentration of 20 μ M As. Arsenate adsorption on oxides and clays was maximal at low pH and decreased with increasing pH above pH 9 for Al oxide, pH 7 for Fe oxide and pH 5 for clays. Arsenite adsorption exhibited parabolic behavior with an adsorption maximum around pH 8.5 for all materials. There was no competitive effect of the presence of equimolar arsenite on arsenate adsorption. The competitive effect of equimolar arsenate on arsenite adsorption was small and apparent only on kaolinite and illite in the pH range 6.5 to 9. The constant capacitance model was able to fit the arsenate and arsenite adsorption envelopes to obtain values of the intrinsic As surface complexation constants. These intrinsic surface complexation constants were then used in the model to predict competitive arsenate and arsenite adsorption from solutions containing equimolar As(III) and As(V) concentrations. The constant capacitance model was able to predict As adsorption from mixed As(III)‐As(V) solutions in systems where there was no competitive effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arsenate and Chromate Retention Mechanisms on Goethite. 1. Surface Structure
Fendorf, S., Eick, M. J., Grossl, P., & Sparks, D. L. (1997) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es950653t · Cited by 1,017
Effect of pH on Adsorption of Arsenic and Selenium from Landfill Leachate by Clay Minerals
Frost, R. R., & Griffin, R. A. (1977) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100010019x · Cited by 268
Cited by
Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review
Mohan, D., & Pittman, C. U. (2007) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006 · Cited by 3,536
Arsenic release from flooded paddy soils is influenced by speciation, Eh, pH, and iron dissolution
Yamaguchi, N., Nakamura, T., Dong, D., Takahashi, Y., Amachi, S., & Makino, T. (2011) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.044 · Cited by 348
Goh, K.-H., & Lim, T.-T. (2004) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.041 · Cited by 305
Formation of Binary and Ternary Colloids and Dissolved Complexes of Organic Matter, Fe and As
Sharma, P., Ofner, J., & Kappler, A. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es100066s · Cited by 281
Zheng, L., Apps, J. A., Zhang, Y., Xu, T., & Birkholzer, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.09.007 · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldberg, S.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 413-421
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W1981026196
- Cited by
- 674
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competitive Adsorption of Arsenate and Arsenite on Oxides and Clay Minerals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2002.4130
- The paper
- Goldberg, S. (2002). Competitive Adsorption of Arsenate and Arsenite on Oxides and Clay Minerals. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.4130
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.