Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 342

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spectral Reflectance Methodology in Comparison to Traditional Soil Analysis

Nanni, Marcos Rafael, Demattê, José Alexandre M.·2006·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

Traditional soil analyses are expensive, time‐consuming, and may also result in environmental pollutants. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a methodology to measure soil attributes using spectral reflectance (SR) as an alternative to traditional methods. Tropical Brazilian soils were sampled over a 196‐ha area divided into grids. Samples ( n = 184) were obtained from the 0‐ to 20‐ and 80‐ to 100‐cm depths and georeferenced. The laboratory SR data were obtained using a Spectroradiometer (400–2 500 nm). Satellite reflectance values were sampled from corrected Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) images. Particle‐size distribution and chemical analysis (organic matter [OM], cation‐exchange capacity [CEC], total SiO 2 , Fe 2 O 3 , TiO 2 , sum of cations, cation, and Al saturation) were performed in the laboratory. Statistical analysis and multiple regression equations for soil attribute predictions using radiometric data were developed. Laboratory data used 22 bands and 13 “Reflectance Inflexion Differences, RID” from different wavelength intervals of the optical spectrum. However, the satellite data used only the reflectance of the 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 TM‐Landsat bands. Multiple regression equations were derived from surface and subsurface soil layers. Estimations of some tropical soil attributes were possible using laboratory spectral analysis. Laboratory SR yielded high correlations with traditional laboratory analyses ( R 2 > 0.79) for the soil attributes such as clay, sand, TiO 2 , and Fe 2 O 3 Satellite spectral data correlated well with most of the soil attributes such as clay, Fe 2 O 3 , and TiO 2 (reaching R 2 = 0.72). The use of soil analysis methodology by satellite and/or ground remote sensing constitutes an alternative to traditional routine laboratory analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj2003.0285

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 342

Metadata

Authors
Nanni, M. R., & Demattê, J. A. M.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
393-407
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2058246635
Cited by
342
References
21
FWCI
12.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spectral Reflectance Methodology in Comparison to Traditional Soil Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2003.0285
The paper
Nanni, M. R., & Demattê, J. A. M. (2006). Spectral Reflectance Methodology in Comparison to Traditional Soil Analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.0285

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.