Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 388

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial Variability Analysis of Soil Physical Properties of Alluvial Soils

Iqbal, Javed, Thomasson, John A., Jenkins, Johnie N., Owens, Phillip R., Whisler, Frank D.·2005·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

Analysis and interpretation of spatial variability of soils is a keystone in site‐specific farming. Soil survey maps may have up to 0.41‐ha inclusions of dissimilar soils within a mapping unit. The objectives of this study were to determine the degree of spatial variability of soil physical properties and variance structure, and to model the sampling interval of alluvial floodplain soils. Soil profiles ( n = 209) from 18 parallel transects were sampled with a mean separation distance of 79.4 m. Each profile was classified into surface, subsurface, and deep horizons. Structural analysis of soil bulk density (ρ b ), sand, clay, saturated hydraulic conductivity ( K s ), volumetric water content (θ v ) at seven pressure potentials (Ψ a ) (−1, −10, −33, −67, −100, −500, and −1500 kPa) were modeled for the three horizons. Variance of soil physical properties varied from as low as 0.01% (ρ b ) to as high as 1542% ( K s ). The LSD test indicated significant ( P < 0.05) differences in sand, clay, ρ b , K s , and θ v at various Ψ a Geostatistical analyses illustrated that the spatially dependent stochastic component was predominant over the nugget effect. Structured semivariogram functions of each variable were used in generating fine‐scale kriged contour maps. Overall autocorrelation, Moran's I , indicated a 400‐m sampling range would be adequate for detection of spatial structure of sand, silt, clay, and a 100‐m sampling range for soil hydraulic properties and ρ b The magnitude and spatial patterns soil physical property variability have implications for variable rate applications and design of soil sampling strategies in alluvial floodplain soils.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj2004.0154

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 388

Metadata

Authors
Iqbal, J., Thomasson, J. A., Jenkins, J. N., Owens, P. R., & Whisler, F. D.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-07
Volume
69
Issue
4
Pages
1338-1350
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2033721274
Cited by
388
References
24
FWCI
7.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial Variability Analysis of Soil Physical Properties of Alluvial Soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2004.0154
The paper
Iqbal, J., Thomasson, J. A., Jenkins, J. N., Owens, P. R., & Whisler, F. D. (2005). Spatial Variability Analysis of Soil Physical Properties of Alluvial Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.0154

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.