Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Soil Carbon Pools in Adjacent Natural and Plantation Forests of Subtropical Australia

Open access
Chen, C. R., Xu, Z. H., Mathers, N. J.·2004·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

Soil C dynamics are not only important to both productivity and sustainability of terrestrial ecosystems, but also contribute significantly to global C cycling. Adjacent natural forest (NF), and first (1R) and second rotation (2R) hoop pine ( Araucaria cunninghamii Aiton ex A. Cunn.) plantations in southeast Queensland, Australia, were selected to investigate the effects of conversion of NF to hoop pine plantations and forest management (harvesting and site preparation of plantation) on the size and the nature of C pools in surface (0–10 cm) soils using chemical extraction, laboratory incubation and 13 C cross‐polarization with magic‐angle‐spinning nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy ( 13 C CPMAS NMR). Conversion from NF to hoop pine plantations not only led to the reduction of soil total C (by 19.8%), water‐soluble organic C (WSOC) (by 17.7%), CaCl 2 –extractable organic C (by 38.8%), and hot water‐extractable organic C (HWEOC) (by 30.9%) and bioavailability of soil C (as determined by CO 2 evolved in the incubation), but also to a change in chemical composition of soil C with lower O‐alkyl C and higher alkyl C under the 1R plantation compared with NF. Harvesting and site preparation did not significantly affect total soil C and most labile C pools (except for a decrease in WSOC), but led to a lower signal intensity in the alkyl C spectral region and a decreased alkyl C/O‐alkyl C (A/O‐A) ratio in the soil under the 2R compared with the 1R plantation. The shifts in the amount and nature of soil C following forest conversion may be attributed to changes in litter inputs, microbial diversity and activity, and the disturbance of soil during harvesting and site preparation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj2004.2820

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Chen, C. R., Xu, Z. H., & Mathers, N. J.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
282-291
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2042884447
Cited by
288
References
51
FWCI
11.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil Carbon Pools in Adjacent Natural and Plantation Forests of Subtropical Australia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2004.2820
The paper
Chen, C. R., Xu, Z. H., & Mathers, N. J. (2004). Soil Carbon Pools in Adjacent Natural and Plantation Forests of Subtropical Australia. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.2820

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.