The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dissolved Organic Matter Characterization Using Multiway Spectral Decomposition of Fluorescence Landscapes
Abstract
Dissolved organic matter (DOM) plays an important role in many soil ecosystem functions. Multidimensional fluorescence spectroscopy of DOM with parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) of the resulting spectral landscape has been successful in characterizing DOM from a variety of aquatic sources. This study was conducted to assess the multiway PARAFAC approach for quantitatively characterizing the fluorescent landscapes of DOM from aqueous extracts of soils and soil amendments. The DOM was extracted from plant biomass representative of crop, wetlands, and tree species; animal manures; and soils from controlled studies of cropping systems with known histories of organic amendments. The fluorescence landscape spectra were collected in the excitation range from 240 to 400 nm and emission range from 300 to 500 nm in 3‐nm increments. The excitation and emission spectra modeled from the PARAFAC analysis showed that the plant biomass, animal manure, and soil DOM contained five fluorescing components: tryptophan‐like (peak location at excitation 270 nm, emission 354 nm), tyrosine‐like (273/309 nm), and three humic‐substance‐like components (>240/465 nm, 306/405 nm, and 315/447 nm). Principal component analysis of the concentration loading showed that the soil‐derived DOM was very similar despite the different types and quantities of organic amendments incorporated in the different cropping systems. This study shows that PARAFAC analysis of multidimensional fluorescence spectra can model the chemical profile of terrestrial DOM in a chemically meaningful way. This represents a significant advance over current approaches to interpreting the complex DOM fluorescence spectra.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular structure in soil humic substances: the new view
Sutton, R., & Sposito, G. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es050778q · Cited by 1,316
Cited by
Ishii, S. K. L., & Boyer, T. H. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2043504 · Cited by 961
Fellman, J. B., D’Amore, D. V., Hood, E., & Boone, R. D. (2008) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-008-9203-x · Cited by 414
Osburn, C. L., Handsel, L. T., Mikan, M. P., Paerl, H. W., & Montgomery, M. T. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es3007723 · Cited by 398
Ohno, T., He, Z., Sleighter, R. L., Honeycutt, C. W., & Hatcher, P. G. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es101089t · Cited by 277
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ohno, T., & Bro, R.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2028-2037
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2013344533
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dissolved Organic Matter Characterization Using Multiway Spectral Decomposition of Fluorescence Landscapes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2006.0005
- The paper
- Ohno, T., & Bro, R. (2006). Dissolved Organic Matter Characterization Using Multiway Spectral Decomposition of Fluorescence Landscapes. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.