Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 316

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Three‐Dimensional Quantification of Intra‐Aggregate Pore‐Space Features using Synchrotron‐Radiation‐Based Microtomography

Peth, S., Horn, R., Beckmann, F., Donath, T., Fischer, J., Smucker, A. J. M.·2008·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

Pore network geometries of intra‐aggregate pore spaces are of great importance for water and ion flux rates controlling C sequestration and bioremediation. Advances in non‐invasive three‐dimensional imaging techniques such as synchrotron‐radiation‐based x‐ray microtomography (SR‐μCT), offer excellent opportunities to study the interrelationships between pore network geometry and physical processes at spatial resolutions of a few micrometers. In this paper we present quantitative three‐dimensional pore‐space geometry analyses of small scale (∼5 mm across) soil aggregates from different soil management systems (conventionally tilled vs. grassland). Reconstructed three‐dimensional microtomography images at approximate isotropic voxel resolutions between 3.2 and 5.4 μm were analyzed for pore‐space morphologies using a suite of image processing algorithms associated with the software published by Lindquist et al. Among the features quantified were pore‐size distributions (PSDs), throat‐area distributions, effective throat/pore radii ratios as well as frequency distributions of pore channel lengths, widths, and flow path tortuosities. We observed differences in storage and transport relevant pore‐space morphological features between the two aggregates. Nodal pore volumes and throat surface areas were significantly smaller for the conventionally tilled ( Conv.T. ) aggregate (mode ≈ 7.9 × 10 −7 mm 3 /≈ 63 μm 2 ) than for the grassland aggregate (mode ≈ 5.0 × 10 −6 mm 3 /≈ 400 μm 2 ), respectively. Path lengths were shorter for the Conv.T. aggregate (maximum lengths < 200 μm) compared with the grassland aggregate (maximum lengths > 600 μm). In summary, the soil aggregate from the Conv.T site showed more gas and water transport limiting micromorphological features compared with the aggregate from the grassland management system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj2007.0130

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 316

Metadata

Authors
Peth, S., Horn, R., Beckmann, F., Donath, T., Fischer, J., & Smucker, A. J. M.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07
Volume
72
Issue
4
Pages
897-907
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2085384044
Cited by
316
References
1
FWCI
46.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three‐Dimensional Quantification of Intra‐Aggregate Pore‐Space Features using Synchrotron‐Radiation‐Based Microtomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2007.0130
The paper
Peth, S., Horn, R., Beckmann, F., Donath, T., Fischer, J., & Smucker, A. J. M. (2008). Three‐Dimensional Quantification of Intra‐Aggregate Pore‐Space Features using Synchrotron‐Radiation‐Based Microtomography. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0130

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.