The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Full‐Inversion Tillage and Organic Carbon Distribution in Soil Profiles: A Meta‐Analysis
Abstract
While the adoption of no‐till (NT) usually leads to the accumulation of soil organic C (SOC) in the surface soil layers, a number of studies have shown that this effect is sometimes partly or completely offset by greater SOC content near the bottom of the plow layer under full‐inversion tillage (FIT). Our purpose was to review the literature in which SOC profiles have been measured under paired NT and FIT situations. Only replicated and randomized studies directly comparing NT and FIT for >5 yr were considered. Profiles of SOC had to be measured to at least 30 cm. As expected, in most studies SOC content was significantly greater ( P < 0.05) under NT than FIT in the surface soil layers. At the 21‐ to 25‐cm soil depth, however, which corresponds to the mean plowing depth for the data set (23 cm), the average SOC content was significantly greater under FIT than NT. Moreover, under FIT, greater SOC content was observed just below the average depth of plowing (26–35 cm). On average, there was 4.9 Mg ha −1 more SOC under NT than FIT ( P = 0.03). Overall, this difference in favor of NT increased significantly but weakly with the duration of the experiment ( R 2 = 0.15, P = 0.05). The relative accumulation of SOC at depth under FIT could not be related to soil or climatic variables. Furthermore, the organic matter accumulating at depth under FIT appeared to be present in relatively stable form, but this hypothesis and the mechanisms involved require further investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation: A Global Data Analysis
West, T. O., & Post, W. M. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1930 · Cited by 2,215
Cited by
Carbon accumulation in agricultural soils after afforestation: a meta-analysis
LAGANIÈRE, J., ANGERS, D. A., & PARÉ, D. (2010) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01930.x · Cited by 956
Self-citationPOEPLAU, C., DON, A., VESTERDAL, L., LEIFELD, J., VAN WESEMAEL, B., SCHUMACHER, J., & GENSIOR, A. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02408.x · Cited by 918
Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation
Powlson, D. S., Stirling, C. M., Jat, M. L., Gerard, B. G., Palm, C. A., Sanchez, P. A., & Cassman, K. G. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2292 · Cited by 901
Powlson, D. S., Whitmore, A. P., & Goulding, K. W. T. (2011) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01342.x · Cited by 829
Aguilera, E., Lassaletta, L., Gattinger, A., & Gimeno, B. S. (2013) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.02.003 · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Angers, D. A., & Eriksen-Hamel, N. S.
- Venue
- Soil Science Society of America Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1370-1374
- ISSN
- 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0661
- OpenAlex
- W2066537743
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Full‐Inversion Tillage and Organic Carbon Distribution in Soil Profiles: A Meta‐Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2007.0342
- The paper
- Angers, D. A., & Eriksen-Hamel, N. S. (2008). Full‐Inversion Tillage and Organic Carbon Distribution in Soil Profiles: A Meta‐Analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0342
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.