Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 529

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Full‐Inversion Tillage and Organic Carbon Distribution in Soil Profiles: A Meta‐Analysis

Angers, D. A., Eriksen-Hamel, N. S.·2008·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

While the adoption of no‐till (NT) usually leads to the accumulation of soil organic C (SOC) in the surface soil layers, a number of studies have shown that this effect is sometimes partly or completely offset by greater SOC content near the bottom of the plow layer under full‐inversion tillage (FIT). Our purpose was to review the literature in which SOC profiles have been measured under paired NT and FIT situations. Only replicated and randomized studies directly comparing NT and FIT for >5 yr were considered. Profiles of SOC had to be measured to at least 30 cm. As expected, in most studies SOC content was significantly greater ( P < 0.05) under NT than FIT in the surface soil layers. At the 21‐ to 25‐cm soil depth, however, which corresponds to the mean plowing depth for the data set (23 cm), the average SOC content was significantly greater under FIT than NT. Moreover, under FIT, greater SOC content was observed just below the average depth of plowing (26–35 cm). On average, there was 4.9 Mg ha −1 more SOC under NT than FIT ( P = 0.03). Overall, this difference in favor of NT increased significantly but weakly with the duration of the experiment ( R 2 = 0.15, P = 0.05). The relative accumulation of SOC at depth under FIT could not be related to soil or climatic variables. Furthermore, the organic matter accumulating at depth under FIT appeared to be present in relatively stable form, but this hypothesis and the mechanisms involved require further investigation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj2007.0342

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 529

Metadata

Authors
Angers, D. A., & Eriksen-Hamel, N. S.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09
Volume
72
Issue
5
Pages
1370-1374
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2066537743
Cited by
529
References
1
FWCI
28.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Full‐Inversion Tillage and Organic Carbon Distribution in Soil Profiles: A Meta‐Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2136/sssaj2007.0342
The paper
Angers, D. A., & Eriksen-Hamel, N. S. (2008). Full‐Inversion Tillage and Organic Carbon Distribution in Soil Profiles: A Meta‐Analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0342

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.