Cited by 918Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportSoil Geostatistics and Mapping

Temporal dynamics of soil organic carbon after land-use change in the temperate zone - carbon response functions as a model approach: SOIL ORGANIC CARBON AND LAND-USE CHANGE

Open access
POEPLAU, CHRISTOPHER, DON, AXEL, VESTERDAL, LARS, LEIFELD, JENS, VAN WESEMAEL, BAS, SCHUMACHER, JENS, GENSIOR, ANDREAS·2011·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Land-use change (LUC) is a major driving factor for the balance of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks and the global carbon cycle. The temporal dynamic of SOC after LUC is especially important in temperate systems with a long reaction time. On the basis of 95 compiled studies covering 322 sites in the temperate zone, carbon response functions (CRFs) were derived to model the temporal dynamic of SOC after five different LUC types (mean soil depth of 30±6 cm). Grassland establishment caused a long lasting carbon sink with a relative stock change of 128±23% and afforestation on former cropland a sink of 116±54%, 100 years after LUC (mean±95% confidence interval). No new equilibrium was reached within 120 years. In contrast, there was no SOC sink following afforestation of grasslands and 75% of all observations showed SOC losses, even after 100 years. Only in the forest floor, there was carbon accumulation of 0.38±0.04 Mg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ in afforestations adding up to 38±4 Mg ha⁻¹ labile carbon after 100 years. Carbon loss after deforestation (−32±20%) and grassland conversion to cropland (−36±5%), was rapid with a new SOC equilibrium being reached after 23 and 17 years, respectively. The change rate of SOC increased with temperature and precipitation but decreased with soil depth and clay content. Subsoil SOC changes followed the trend of the topsoil SOC changes but were smaller (25±5% of the total SOC changes) and with a high uncertainty due to a limited number of datasets. As a simple…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02408.x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CO2 balance of energy crops can be estimated by carbon stock changes in above- and below-ground biomass and in soils, and strongly depends on previous land-use and former carbon stock levels, especially the soil organic carbon pool.

    “The CO 2 balance of energy crops can be estimated by C stock changes in above and below ground biomass and in soils.This strongly depends on the previous land-use and former C stock levels, especially for the largest terrestrial C pool, the soil organic carbon (SOC) pool.”
  • Land-use types with high soil organic carbon stocks, such as grasslands on organic soils, are more susceptible to land-use change to conventional energy crops than low-carbon systems, such as croplands on well-drained soils.

    “Land-use types with high SOC stocks, such as grasslands on organic soils, are more susceptible to land-use change to conventional energy crops than low C systems, such as croplands on well-drained soils (Poeplau et al., 2011).”
  • In general, annual cropland conversion to perennial crops results in increased SOC stocks but SOC decreased if perennial crops or grasslands are converted to annual crops.

    “In general, annual cropland conversion to perennial crops results in increased SOC stocks but SOC decreased if perennial crops or grasslands are converted to annual crops (Anderson-Teixeira et al., 2009;Poeplau et al., 2011).”
  • On average most grasslands store higher SOC stocks than croplands under similar site conditions.

    “Even though there is a wide range of grassland management types, on average most grasslands store higher SOC stocks than croplands under similar site conditions (Poeplau et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
POEPLAU, C., DON, A., VESTERDAL, L., LEIFELD, J., VAN WESEMAEL, B., SCHUMACHER, J., & GENSIOR, A.
Affiliations
  • Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE)
  • Agroscope (CH)
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Corresponding author
DON, AXEL
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-01
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
2415-2427
ISSN
1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166135450
Cited by
918
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 26
FWCI
60.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Keywords
soil organic carbon, land use change, temporal dynamics, temperate soils, afforestation, grassland establishment, deforestation, cropland conversion, carbon sink, carbon loss, forest floor carbon, labile carbon, soil depth, greenhouse gas reporting, UNFCCC

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review