Cited by 51Clay minerals and soil interactionsMineralogy and Gemology StudiesGeological and Geochemical Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Formation of regularly interstratified serpentine-chlorite minerals by tetrahedral inversion in long-period serpentine polytypes

Banfield, Jillian F., Bailey, Sturges W.·1996·American Mineralogist

Abstract

Serpentinite from Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, consists of a variety of fme-grained serpentine minerals, chlorite, randomly interstratified serpentine-chlorite, and a series of phases based on regular interstratification of serpentine and chlorite (SxCy, where x and y are integers). Within the resolution of the AEM technique, all layer silicates have the same Mg-rich, AI-rich, Cr-rich, and Fe-poor compositions. Regularly interstratified serpentinechlorite minerals are frequently intimately intergrown with serpentines that have repeat distances identical to those of the regular interstratifications. Thus, dozyite (SICI, (3= 90°) is intimately associated with serpentine with three-layer octahedral order (1,1,11).Longer period polysomes (S2C SIC2, S2C2, S,C3, S3C2, and S,C4, all with (3 = 90°) are each accompanied by serpentines with equivalent c-axis periodicities. SxCy phases apparently form by selective growth ofIbb chlorite units from 1,11octahedral sequences in long-period serpentines. All microscopic structural evidence is consistent with the formation of regular interstratifications by tetrahedral inversion within existing serpentine. Atomic resolution images reveal that the tetrahedral sheet is displaced by a13.where it inverts to form the 2:1 layer. A :ta13 shift is required for hydrogen bonding between OH of the newly formed brucite-like interlayer and 0 atoms of the 2: 1 layer. The sense of the shift is determined by the strong interactions between the octahedral cations in the brucite-like interlayer and the Si in the 2: 1 layer (direct superimposition, previously described as a type-a interaction, is strongly unfavorable). Distortion at the inversion point probably lengthens Si-O bonds in the next tetrahedra, facilitating relocation of Si on the other side of the basal 0 plane. Reversal of the octahedral slant in the 2:1 layer occurs because the +a13 tetrahedral shift necessitates repositioning of 0 and OH coordinating octahedral cations, requiring movement of octahedral cations from type-II to type-I positions. Except in the 2: 1 layers, the stacking and octahedral slants are inherited. The result is a series of regular interstratifications characterized by a single octahedral slant (specifically, Ibbb,l) and bl3 stacking disorder. This analysis reveals the importance of cation-cation interactions in determining the relative stability of pairs of 1:1 layers and in controlling the detailed structures oflayer silicates formed in solid-state serpentine-to-chlorite reactions. Because similar constraints apply to formation of serpentine from chlorite by direct structural modification, the common 1T lizardite polytype may be produced from both IIbb and Ibb chlorites.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2138/am-1996-1-211

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The observed intermediate phases are analogous to locally ordered domains in mixed-layer clay minerals such as interstratified chlorite/serpentine, chlorite/biotite, and chlorite/pyrophyllite.

    “The observed intermediate phases are analogous to those locally ordered domains in mixed-layer clay minerals, such as interstratified chlorite/serpentine, chlorite/biotite, and chlorite/pyrophyllite minerals (Banfield and Bailey, 1996; Xu and Veblen, 1996; Xu et al., 1996; Wang and Xu, 2006).”

    From Z-contrast imaging and ab initio study on "d" superstructure in sedimentary dolomite (2014) · cites this paper as Banfield and Bailey, 1996

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Banfield, J. F., & Bailey, S. W.
Venue
American Mineralogist
Published
1996-02-01
Volume
81
Issue
1-2
Pages
79-91
ISSN
0003-004X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2187272544
Cited by
51
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Mineralogist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Clay minerals and soil interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
chlorite, serpentinite, hydrogen bonding, phyllosilicates, selective growth, atomic resolution imaging, Si–O bond lengths

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review