Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 700

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The application of electron backscatter diffraction and orientation contrast imaging in the SEM to textural problems in rocks

Open access
Prior, David J., Boyle, Alan P., Brenker, Frank, Cheadle, Michael C., Day, Austin, Lopez, Gloria, Peruzzi, Luca, Potts, Graham, Reddy, Steve, Spiess, Richard, Timms, Nick E., Trimby, Pat, Wheeler, John, Zetterstrom, Lena·1999·American Mineralogist

Abstract

In a scanning electron microscope (SEM) an electron beam sets up an omni-directional source of scattered electrons within a specimen. Diffraction of these electrons will occur simultaneously on all lattice planes in the sample and the backscattered electrons (BSE), which escape from the specimen, will form a diffraction pattern that can be imaged on a phosphor screen. This is the basis of electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). Similar diffraction effects cause individual grains of different orientations to give different total BSE. SEM images that exploit this effect will show orientation contrast (OC). EBSD and OC imaging are SEM-based crystallographic tools. EBSD enables measurement of the crystallographic orientation of individual rock-forming minerals as small as 1 μm, and the calculation of misorientation axes and angles between any two data points. OC images enable mapping of all misorientation boundaries in a specimen and thus provide a location map for EBSD analyses. EBSD coupled to OC imaging in the SEM enables complete specimen microtextures and mesotextures to be determined. EBSD and OC imaging can be applied to any mineral at a range of scales and enable us to expand the microstructural approach, so successful in studies of quartz rocks, for example, to the full range of rock-forming minerals. Automated EBSD analysis of rocks remains problematic, although continuing technical developments are enabling progress in this area. EBSD and OC are important new tools for petrologists and petrographers. Present and future applications of EBSD and OC imaging include phase identification, studying deformation mechanisms, constraining dislocation slip systems, empirical quantification of microstructures, studying metamorphic processes, studying magmatic processes, and constraining geochemical microsampling. In all these cases, quantitative crystallographic orientation data enable more rigorous testing of models to explain observed microstructures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2138/am-1999-11-1204

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 700

Metadata

Authors
Prior, D. J., Boyle, A. P., Brenker, F., Cheadle, M. C., Day, A., Lopez, G., Peruzzi, L., Potts, G., Reddy, S., Spiess, R., Timms, N. E., Trimby, P., Wheeler, J., & Zetterstrom, L.
Venue
American Mineralogist
Published
1999-12-01
Volume
84
Issue
11-12
Pages
1741-1759
ISSN
0003-004X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164507998
Cited by
700
References
1
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The application of electron backscatter diffraction and orientation contrast imaging in the SEM to textural problems in rocks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2138/am-1999-11-1204
The paper
Prior, D. J., Boyle, A. P., Brenker, F., Cheadle, M. C., Day, A., Lopez, G., Peruzzi, L., Potts, G., Reddy, S., Spiess, R., Timms, N. E., Trimby, P., Wheeler, J., & Zetterstrom, L. (1999). The application of electron backscatter diffraction and orientation contrast imaging in the SEM to textural problems in rocks. American Mineralogist. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-1999-11-1204

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.