Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Formation of rutile nuclei at anatase (112) twin interfaces and the phase transformation mechanism in nanocrystalline titania

Open access
Penn, R. Lee, Banfield, Jillian F.·1999·American Mineralogist

Abstract

Room-temperature volume measurements of the complete set of calcite-structure carbonates in the pressure range 0-8.1 GPa revealed systematic differences in compressibilities that depend on cation type, resulting in significant deviations from empirical relations of an inverse linear correla­tion between K 0 and V 0 . The bulk modulus for MgCO 3 lies approximately 18 GPa below the trend for the 3d transition metal carbonates, which show an expected inverse linear correlation of bulk modu­lus with ambient cell volume (and M-O bond length). The bulk modulus of CdCO 3 , whose M-O bond length and cell volume are only slightly smaller than those of CaCO 3 , lies up to 10 GPa above the trend of the 3d transition metal carbonates and about 30 GPa above that of calcite. These deviations in compressibility trends as a function of cell volume (or M-O bond length) are expressed as differ­ences in a axis compressibility but not in c axis compressibility, which shows a nearly linear increase with M-O distance. Hence, systematic behavior is apparently limited to subsets of carbonates in which metal ions share the same valence electron character (i.e., s vs. 3d vs. 4d) and is primarily attributed to unexpected compressibility differences along the a axis. Crystal-field effects, beyond those reflected in the M-O distances, cannot account for the ob­served compressibilities. Nonbonded interactions also fail to explain the deviations from predicted trends. Variations of electronegativity and vibrational frequency with ionic radius for the relevant metal ions show differences that are qualitatively similar to the observed trends of bulk modulus, suggesting that differences in bonding character may contribute to the different behaviors among the subsets of calcite-structure carbonates. However, it is most likely that a combination of factors is necessary to account fully for the observed behavior.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2138/am-1999-5-621

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
Penn, R. L., & Banfield, J. F.
Venue
American Mineralogist
Published
1999-06-01
Volume
84
Issue
5-6
Pages
871-876
ISSN
0003-004X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1872019155
Cited by
270
References
18
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formation of rutile nuclei at anatase (112) twin interfaces and the phase transformation mechanism in nanocrystalline titania. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2138/am-1999-5-621
The paper
Penn, R. L., & Banfield, J. F. (1999). Formation of rutile nuclei at anatase (112) twin interfaces and the phase transformation mechanism in nanocrystalline titania. American Mineralogist. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-1999-5-621

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.