Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 573

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Application of new experimental and garnet Margules data to the garnet-biotite geothermometer

Holdaway, M.J.·2000·American Mineralogist

Abstract

Garnet-biotite experiments now exist from Ferry and Spear (1978, FS), Perchuk and Lavrent'eva (1983, PL), and Gessmann et al. (1997, GE). Recent garnet Margules parameters exist from Berman and Aranovich (1996, BA), Ganguly et al. (1996, GA), and Mukhopadhyay et al. (1997, MU). A comparison of ∆G mix plots for garnet binaries shows similarity among models with some significant differences. In all, 20 garnet-biotite geothermometers were retrieved from the various data using a modified form of the approach of Holdaway et al. (1997, HO) such that experimental vs. calculated values of T, in °C, were regressed stepwise to a line with intercept of zero and slope of one, maximizing r 2 . All tests assumed the GA model for garnet MnMg and the HO Fe 3+ correction and ∆W Ti Bio . The experimental combinations (sets) were: (1) GE + FS with GE values of VI Al Bio in FS; (2) PL + FS with GE VI Al Bio in FS; (3) PL + FS with GE VI Al Bio in FS, increasing W Gr MnMg by 5 kJ; (4) PL + FS with no VI Al Bio in FS, increasing W Gr MnMg by 5 kJ; (5) PL + FS with 0.10 VI Al Bio in FS, increasing W Gr MnMg by 5 kJ; (6) PL + FS + GE with 0.10 VI Al Bio in FS, increasing WGr MnMg by 5 kJ. Models are designated by a number for the experimental set and letters to designate the above garnet model, e.g., 5BA. Experimental sets vary in maximum r 2 as follows: (1) 0.892-0.896; (2) 0.943-0.956; (3) 0.943- 0.955; (4) 0.980-0.982; (5) 0.980-0.983; and (6) 0.939-0.944. Application to the HO Maine biotitegarnet data gives the following sequence of increasing quality from experimental sets: 1 < 2 < 3 < 6 < 4 ≡ 5. The various garnet models show only small differences in r 2 and in quality with the Maine data base. For all 20 models, average T (°C) for the Maine M3 staurolite zone varies between 554(15) and 588(13). The best models appear to be 5BA, 5GA, and 5MU, which allow for 0.10 VI Al in FS biotite. A model based on an average of the three garnet Margules models, 5AV, has some justification and provides a slight improvement. Model 5AV gives (in J) ∆G ex = 40198 - 7.80T; W Bio FeMg = 22998 - 17.40T; ∆W Al Bio = 245559 - 280.31T , and Maine M3 average staurolite zone T = 571(12) °C. The high quality of sets based mainly on PL experiments (2-5 above) results in part from their experimental P of 6 kbar. The results suggest that FS biotite contained only minor VI Al. The wide ranges of derived exchange and biotite Margules parameters, which provide reasonable calibrations, indicate that while accuracy in parameters is important, consistency is even more important. These geothermometers (5BA, 5GA, 5MU, 5AV) are available on PC disk. I recommend geothermometer 5AV.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2138/am-2000-0701

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 573

Metadata

Authors
Holdaway, M. J.
Venue
American Mineralogist
Published
2000-07
Volume
85
Issue
7-8
Pages
881-892
ISSN
0003-004X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1930514495
Cited by
573
References
15
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Application of new experimental and garnet Margules data to the garnet-biotite geothermometer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2138/am-2000-0701
The paper
Holdaway, M. J. (2000). Application of new experimental and garnet Margules data to the garnet-biotite geothermometer. American Mineralogist. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2000-0701

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.