Cited by 28South Asian Studies and DiasporaMigration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical GeographyMigration and Labor Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Partition of India: Demographic Consequences

Open access
Bharadwaj, Prashant, Khwaja, Asim Ijaz, Mian, Atif R.·2009·SSRN Electronic Journal

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.1294846

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Migrants who moved to India were more educated than the natives who stayed behind.

    “Migrants who moved to India were more educated than the natives who stayed behind (Bharadwaj, Khwaja, and Mian, 2009).”

    From Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India (2019) · cites this paper as Bharadwaj, Khwaja, and Mian, 2009

  • Refugee inflows of Hindus and Sikhs were correlated with refugee outflows of Muslims.

    “refugee inflows of hindus and sikhs were correlated with refugee outflows of muslims”

    From Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India (2019) · cites this paper as Bharadwaj, Khwaja, and Mian (2009)

  • Areas closer to the partition border experienced both greater refugee inflows and refugee outflows.

    “areas closer to the partition border experienced both greater refugee inflows as well as refugee outflows.”

    From Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India (2019) · cites this paper as Bharadwaj, Khwaja, and Mian (2009)

  • According to Bharadwaj, Khwaja, and Mian (2009), Indian districts that received refugees at Partition experienced a net increase in their literacy rates.

    “According to Bharadwaj, Khwaja, and Mian (2009) Indian districts that received refugees at Partition experienced a net increase in their literacy rates.”

    From Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India (2019) · cites this paper as Bharadwaj, Khwaja, and Mian (2009)

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. A Basch, 1952, Reviewed Work of Economic Consequences of Divided India by CN Vakil, American Economic Review
  2. A Bopegamage, 1957, A Study in Urban Sociology, Sociology Series
  3. G Borjas, 1994, The Economics of Immigration, Journal of Economic Literature, 10.3386/w4955 · DOI
  4. G Borjas, 1996, Searching for the Effect of Immigration on the Labor Market, American Economic Review, 10.3386/w5454 · DOI
  5. S Bose, 1998, Modern South Asia: History
  6. G Boyer, 1993, The Impact of Emigration on Real Wages in Ireland 1850-1914, CEPR Discussion Papers, 854
  7. P Brass, 1990, Butalia U. The Other Side of Silence: Voices from the Partition of India
  8. P Cheema, 1997, The Politics of the Punjab Boundary Award, Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics, Working Paper (1), 2000. Cernea, M. The Risks and Reconstruction Model for Resettling Displaced Populations
  9. K Davis, 1951, The Population of India and Pakistan
  10. W Fernandes, 1989, Displacement and Rehabilitation: An Estimate of Extent and Prospects, Development, Displacement and Rehabilitation
  11. A Ghosh, 1931, Government of India, Census of India, Government of Pakistan, Census of Pakistan, 1954
  12. Timothy Guinnane, 1997, The Vanishing Irish
  13. R Lalonde, 1996, Economic Impact of International Migration and the Economic Performance of Immigrants, Handbook of Population and Family Economics, 10.1016/s1574-003x(97)80006-2 · DOI
  14. T & Hatton, 1998, The Age of Mass Migration: Causes and Economic Impact
  15. T & Hatton, 1994, What drove the mass migrations from Europe in the late nineteenth century?, Population and Development Review, 10.2307/2137600 · DOI
  16. K Hill, 1997, The partition of India: new demographic estimates of associated population change International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, International Population Conference, Journal of Refugee Studies
  17. G & Yong Kudaisya, 2000, The Aftermath of Partition in South Asia, 10.4324/9780203450604 · DOI
  18. S H Manto, 1997, Mottled Dawn; Fifty Sketches and Stories of Partition
  19. S Sarkar, 1885, 10.1007/978-1-349-19712-5 · DOI
  20. L Sherwani, 1986, The partition of India and Mountbatten
  21. S & Major General Shahid, 1993, Disasterous Twilight: A Personal Record of the Partition of India
  22. A Singh, 1983, An Overview of Migration in India, its Impacts and Key Issues, www.livelihoods.org. Sugata,B & Jalal, A. Modern South Asia: History, Urban Development in the Third World
  23. C N Vakil, 1950, Economic Consequences of Divided India, International Migration Review
  24. T W Wallbank, 1966, Propensity of a certain group in occupation x is simply defined as (people of a certain group in occupation x)/(total number of labor force particiapants in that group), The partition of India: causes and responsibilities
  25. Weight None Inflow None Inflow None Inflow Std Errors in brackets. * significant at 5%
  26. ** significant at 1%, + significant at 10%
  27. Computation of outflow is discussed in the Appendix. Inflows are people moving into a given district due to partition, outflows are those moving out. Distance is measured as the straight line to the border from the center of a district. City dummy was created from the 24 largest cities (in terms of population) from 1931. This data was obtained from the Historical Atlas of South Asia (Schwartzberg, 1978). Weights are used to give more importance to those areas with more migrants. Some areas that receive few migrants who are all engaged in agriculture (say) could affect results even though they are not important in terms of overall inflows, This table examines the impact of distance, outflows and the presence of a city in that district on the proportion of agriculturists in the inflow in that district
  28. Weights None Inflow None Inflow None Inflow Std Errors in brackets. * significant at 5%
  29. ** significant at 1%, + significant at 10%
  30. 1978, Computation of outflow is discussed in the Appendix. Inflows are people moving into a given district due to partition, outflows are those moving out. Distance is measured as the straight line to the border from the center of a district. Minorities in India are Muslims. In Pakistan and Bangladesh minorities are Hindus and Sikhs. The remaining populations in each country is considered the majority while computing the minoritymajority ratio. City dummy was created from the 24 largest cities (in terms of population) from 1931, This table examines the impact of distance, outflow, minority-majority ratio and the presence of a city in a district on the proportion of men in the inflow population
  31. Appendix Ii Table V Where, 10.4159/harvard.9780674492912.c19 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bharadwaj, P., Khwaja, A. I., & Mian, A. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Corresponding author
Mian, Atif R.
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1577115092
Cited by
28
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › South Asian Studies and Diaspora
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Migration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical Geography
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
Keywords
Partition of India, population exchange, forced migration, demographic change, literacy rate, educational attainment, occupational structure, gender composition, religious homogenization, district-level analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review