The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Competition and Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic Perspective
Holmstrom, B. (1999) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00083 · Cited by 3,172
Cited by
Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship*
Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2005) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/0033553053970214 · Cited by 995
Self-citationArtificial intelligence and industrial innovation: Evidence from German firm-level data
Rammer, C., Fernández, G. P., & Czarnitzki, D. (2022) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104555 · Cited by 489
(2016) · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.12.014 · Cited by 319
De Loecker, J., & Eeckhout, J. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w24768 · Cited by 308
Inequality: a hidden cost of market power
Ennis, S. F., Gonzaga, P., & Pike, C. (2019) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grz017 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R. W., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P.
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101171995
- Cited by
- 2,117
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competition and Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2139/ssrn.1306944
- The paper
- Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R. W., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2004). Competition and Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1306944
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
