PreprintCited by 328Income, Poverty, and InequalityFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisEconomic Theory and Policy

Recent Trends in Household Wealth in the United States: Rising Debt and the Middle-Class Squeeze - An Update to 2007

Open access
Wolff, Edward N.·2010·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

I find here that the early and mid-aughts (2001 to 2007) witnessed both exploding debt and a consequent “middle-class squeeze.” Median wealth grew briskly in the late 1990s. It grew even faster in the aughts, while the inequality of net worth was up slightly. Indebtedness, which fell substantially during the late 1990s, skyrocketed in the early and mid-aughts; among the middle class, the debt-to-income ratio reached its highest level in 24 years. The concentration of investment-type assets generally remained as high in 2007 as during the previous two decades. The racial and ethnic disparity in wealth holdings, after stabilizing throughout most of the 1990s, widened in the years between 1998 and 2001, but then narrowed during the early and midaughts. Wealth also shifted in relative terms, away from young households (particularly those under age 45) and toward those in the 55–74 age group. Projections to July 2009, made on the basis of changes in stock and housing prices, indicate that median wealth plunged by 36 percent and there was a fairly steep rise in wealth inequality, with the Gini coefficient advancing from 0.834 to 0.865.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.1585409

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The average onepercenter in the US around the time of the study had a net worth of around $18 million and invested about half of it in stocks.

    “the average onepercenter in the US around the time of their study had a net worth of around $18 million and invested about half of it in stocks (Wolff, 2010)”
  • The percent of millionaires and multimillionaires expanded between 1983 and 2007 several fold.

    “These data suggest that the percent of millionaires and multimillionaires expanded between 1983 and 2007 several fold (Table 2).”

    From Modeling Social Pressures Toward Political Instability (2013) · cites this paper as Wolff 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolff, E. N.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Corresponding author
Wolff, Edward N.
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103769746
Cited by
328
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 43
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
Keywords
household wealth, household debt, wealth inequality, debt-to-income ratio, housing prices, stock prices, Gini coefficient, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review