Cited by 25Public Procurement and PolicySustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

Is Public Procurement Going Green? Experiences and Open Issues

Open access
Appolloni, Andrea, D'Amato, Alessio, Cheng, Wenjuan·2011·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.1970583

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 25

Authors
Appolloni, A., D'Amato, A., & Cheng, W.
Affiliations
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
Corresponding author
Appolloni, Andrea
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011
Pages
111-132
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1907636242
Cited by
25
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
green public procurement, public procurement, environmental quality, integrated product policy, green markets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review