Value and Momentum Everywhere
Open accessAbstract
We study the returns to value and momentum strategies jointly across eight diverse markets and asset classes. Finding consistent value and momentum premia in every asset class, we further find strong common factor structure among their returns. Value and momentum are more positively correlated across asset classes than passive exposures to the asset classes themselves. However, value and momentum are negatively correlated both within and across asset classes. Our results indicate the presence of common global risks that we characterize with a three factor model. Global funding liquidity risk is a partial source of these patterns, which are identifiable only when examining value and momentum simultaneously across markets. Our findings present a challenge to existing behavioral, institutional, and rational asset pricing theories that largely focus on U.S. equities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In conventional quantitative trading models, numeric data has played a crucial role.
“In conventional quantitative trading models, numeric data has played a crucial role[2, 31].”
From Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [2]
Cites
An Institutional Theory of Momentum and Reversal
Vayanos, D., & Woolley, P. (2008) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w14523 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Dennis Stattman, 1980, Book values and stock returns, Chicago MBA: A Journal of Selected Papers, 5, 25
- Lu Zhang, 2005, The value premium, P3 -P1 Factor P3 -P1 Factor P3 -P1 Factor P3 -P1 Factor P3 -P1 Factor P3 -P1 Factor, 60, 67
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey
Ding, H., Li, Y., Wang, J., Chen, H., Guo, D., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 9th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business · doi:10.1145/3802463.3802475 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Asness, C. S., Moskowitz, T. J., & Pedersen, L. H.
- Affiliations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Copenhagen Business School (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Moskowitz, Tobias J.
- ORCID
- Pedersen, Lasse Heje
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4239701050
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
- Keywords
- value premium, momentum premium, three-factor model, asset pricing anomalies, cross-market correlation, behavioral finance, institutional investors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review