Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Efficiencies and Regulatory Shortcuts: How Should We Regulate Companies like Airbnb and Uber?

Open access
Edelman, Benjamin G., Geradin, Damien·2015·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

New software platforms use modern information technology, including full-featured web sites and mobile apps, to allow service providers and consumers to transact with relative ease and increased trust. These platforms provide notable benefits including reducing transaction costs, improving allocation of resources, and information and pricing efficiencies. Yet they also raise questions of regulation, including how regulation should adapt to new services and capabilities, and how to correct market failures that may arise. We explore these challenges and suggest an updated regulatory framework that is sufficiently flexible to allow software platforms to operate and deliver their benefits, while ensuring that service providers, users and third parties are adequately protected from harms that may arise.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.2658603

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Nairi Hourdajian, 2014, Insurance For UberX With Ridesharing, UBER NEWSROOM
  2. Christian Denmon, 2014, Traditional Taxis: How do Injury Insurance Claims Compare?, HUFFINGTON POST
  3. Matt Richtel, 2014, Distracted Driving and the Risks of Ride-Hailing Services Like Uber, NEW YORK TIMES
  4. Rosanna Smart, 2015, Faster and Cheaper: How Ride-Sourcing Fills a Gap in Low-Income Los Angeles Neighborhoods, BOTEC ANALYSIS CORP
  5. Lucy, 2015, Ride Like a Pro, UBER NEWSROOM
  6. 2014, The posted rules have not been updated since the $0.30/ride surcharge was passed and implemented, but see Important Notice Regarding Upcoming Taxicab and SHL Improvement Surcharges, 35, 82
  7. Ari Levy, 2012, Airbnb: To Tax or Not Tax a Rented Bed, BLOOMBERG BUSINESS
  8. Thomas Dinapoli, 2011, Review of the Financial Plan of the City of, 16
  9. E G See, 2011, Cal. Ordinance No, 3964, 10.5962/bhl.title.30286 · DOI
  10. Angie Schmitt, 2013, Updated: Drivers Cover Just 51 Percent of U.S. Road Spending, STREETSBLOG USA
  11. Claire Groden, 2015, Two Uber Executives Arrested in France, FORTUNE
  12. E G See, 2015, Uber Technologies Inc., 82 F.Supp.3d 1133
  13. 1985, Respondeat superior is a common-law doctrine that makes an employer liable for the actions of an employee when the actions take place within the scope of employment
  14. 2003, Secondary liability arises when a party materially contributes to, facilitates, induces, or is otherwise responsible for infringing acts carried out by another party. See Giuseppe Dari Mattiacci & Francesco Parisi, The Cost of Delegated Control: Vicarious Liability, Secondary Liability and Mandatory Insurance
  15. 2013, Comm'n of the State of Cal, 7

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Edelman, B. G., & Geradin, D.
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2221455182
Cited by
274
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficiencies and Regulatory Shortcuts: How Should We Regulate Companies like Airbnb and Uber? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2139/ssrn.2658603
The paper
Edelman, B. G., & Geradin, D. (2015). Efficiencies and Regulatory Shortcuts: How Should We Regulate Companies like Airbnb and Uber? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2658603

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.