Cited by 379Digital Economy and Work TransformationSharing Economy and PlatformsLegal and Labor Studies

The “sharing” economy: labor, inequality, and social connection on for‐profit platforms

Schor, Juliet B., Attwood‐Charles, William·2017·Sociology Compass

Abstract

For social analysts, what has come to be called the “sharing economy” raises important questions. After a discussion of history and definitions, we focus on 3 areas of research in the for‐profit segment, also called the platform economy: social connection, conditions for laborers, and inequalities. Although we find that some parts of the platform economy, particularly Airbnb, do foster social connection, there are also ways in which even shared hospitality is becoming more like conventional exchange. With respect to labor conditions, we find they vary across platforms and the degree to which workers are dependent on the platform to meet their basic needs. On inequality, there is mounting evidence that platforms are facilitating person‐to‐person discrimination by race. In addition, platforms are advantaging those who already have human capital or physical assets, in contrast to claims that they provide widespread opportunity or even advantage less privileged individuals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/soc4.12493

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The platform economy must be partially understood in relationship to the general labor market.

    “A second insight is that the platform economy must be partially understood in relationship to the general labor market (Schor 2017).”

    From Dependence and precarity in the platform economy (2020) · cites this paper as Schor 2017

  • Platforms have been facilitating a new kind of opportunity-hoarding by the more privileged segments of the middle class.

    “The high education levels of providers, coupled with the predominance of supplemental earners suggests that platforms have been facilitating a new kind of opportunity-hoarding by the more privileged segments of the middle class (Schor 2017).”

    From Dependence and precarity in the platform economy (2020) · cites this paper as Schor 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schor, J. B., & Attwood‐Charles, W.
Affiliations
Boston College (US)
Corresponding author
Schor, Juliet B.
Venue
Sociology Compass
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-13
Volume
11
Issue
8
ISSN
1751-9020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2734686021
Cited by
379
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 4
FWCI
83.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sociology Compass (publishedVersion)
Funders
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
Keywords
sharing economy, platform economy, Airbnb, working conditions, inequality, social connectedness, race, human capital, gig economy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review