The “sharing” economy: labor, inequality, and social connection on for‐profit platforms
Abstract
For social analysts, what has come to be called the “sharing economy” raises important questions. After a discussion of history and definitions, we focus on 3 areas of research in the for‐profit segment, also called the platform economy: social connection, conditions for laborers, and inequalities. Although we find that some parts of the platform economy, particularly Airbnb, do foster social connection, there are also ways in which even shared hospitality is becoming more like conventional exchange. With respect to labor conditions, we find they vary across platforms and the degree to which workers are dependent on the platform to meet their basic needs. On inequality, there is mounting evidence that platforms are facilitating person‐to‐person discrimination by race. In addition, platforms are advantaging those who already have human capital or physical assets, in contrast to claims that they provide widespread opportunity or even advantage less privileged individuals.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The platform economy must be partially understood in relationship to the general labor market.
“A second insight is that the platform economy must be partially understood in relationship to the general labor market (Schor 2017).”
From Dependence and precarity in the platform economy (2020) · cites this paper as Schor 2017
Platforms have been facilitating a new kind of opportunity-hoarding by the more privileged segments of the middle class.
“The high education levels of providers, coupled with the predominance of supplemental earners suggests that platforms have been facilitating a new kind of opportunity-hoarding by the more privileged segments of the middle class (Schor 2017).”
From Dependence and precarity in the platform economy (2020) · cites this paper as Schor 2017
Cites
The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-0999 · Cited by 1,903 · see citing works
Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework
Gawer, A. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006 · Cited by 1,869 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Economists take a different approach and emphasize that these are multisided markets—that is, the platform faces both workers and consumers (Gawer, 2014).”
BackgroundDigital Discrimination: The Case of Airbnb.com
Edelman, B. G., & Luca, M. (2014) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2377353 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda
Sutherland, W., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.004 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
Dependence and precarity in the platform economy
Schor, J. B., Attwood-Charles, W., Cansoy, M., Ladegaard, I., & Wengronowitz, R. (2020) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-020-09408-y · Cited by 550 · see citing works
“For a discussion of these issues, see Schor (2017).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Digital Nomad Lifestyle: (Remote) Work/Leisure Balance, Privilege, and Constructed Community
Thompson, B. Y. (2019) · International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure · doi:10.1007/s41978-018-00030-y · Cited by 293 · see citing works
The ethical debate about the gig economy: A review and critical analysis
Tan, Z. M., Aggarwal, N., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101594 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Ajunwa, I., & Greene, D. (2019) · Research in the Sociology of Work · doi:10.1108/s0277-283320190000033005 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Trust and power in Airbnb's digital rating and reputation system
Christiaens, T. (2025) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-025-09825-6 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Such information asymmetries foster distrust among trading partners (Schor & Attwood-Charles, 2017, 5–6; Ravenelle, 2019, 29; Yang et al., 2019, 1980).”
- Authors
- Schor, J. B., & Attwood‐Charles, W.
- Affiliations
- Boston College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schor, Juliet B.
- Venue
- Sociology Compass
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-07-13
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 1751-9020 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2734686021
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 83.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sociology Compass (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
- Keywords
- sharing economy, platform economy, Airbnb, working conditions, inequality, social connectedness, race, human capital, gig economy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review