Racial Discrimination in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from a Field Experiment
Open accessAbstract
In an experiment on Airbnb, we find that applications from guests with distinctively African-American names are 16% less likely to be accepted relative to identical guests with distinctively White names. Discrimination occurs among landlords of all sizes, including small landlords sharing the property and larger landlords with multiple properties. It is most pronounced among hosts who have never had an African-American guest, suggesting only a subset of hosts discriminate. While rental markets have achieved significant reductions in discrimination in recent decades, our results suggest that Airbnb’s current design choices facilitate discrimination and raise the possibility of erasing some of these civil rights gains.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the sharing economy, Airbnb guests with Black-sounding names were approximately 16% less likely to be accepted than identical guests with white names.
“More recently, Edelman, Luca, and Svirsky (2015) found that in the sharing economy, guests with Black sounding names on the website Airbnb were approximately 16% less likely to be accepted than identical guests with white names.”
From Conceptualizing color-evasiveness: using dis/ability critical race theory to expand a color-blind racial ideology in education and society (2017) · cites this paper as Edelman, Luca, and Svirsky (2015)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 26 · Cited by 999
- Authors
- Edelman, B. G., Luca, M., & Svirsky, D.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-22
- ISSN
- 1945-7782 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-5068
- OpenAlex
- W3123029532
- Cited by
- 999
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 169 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 137 · 2019: 135 · 2018: 122 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 245.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Economic Journal Applied Economics (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- racial discrimination, sharing economy, Airbnb, name discrimination, rental housing, housing discrimination, platform design, hosts, field experiments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review