CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10Ethics in Clinical ResearchEthics and bioethics in healthcareQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

Recovering the History of Informed Consent for Data Science and Internet Industry Research Ethics

Open access
Sedenberg, Elaine, Hoffmann, Anna Lauren·2016·SSRN Electronic Journal
DOI 10.2139/ssrn.2837585
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.2837585

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Consent shows respect towards students and reinforces their autonomy and freedom of choice.

    “also highlighted the significance of this consent to show respect towards students and reinforce their autonomy and freedom of choice.”

    From Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education (2023) · cites this paper as Sedenberg & Hoffmann, 2016

  • Well-informed consent demonstrates students' ease with the use of data by teachers to enhance their own learning performance.

    “consent must be well informed as a pragmatic approach to building trust among students since the consent demonstrates their ease with the use of data by teachers to enhance their own learning performance (Li et al., 2021; Sedenberg & Hoffmann, 2016)”

    From Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education (2023) · cites this paper as Sedenberg & Hoffmann, 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education

    Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.-P. T. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w · Cited by 1,228 · see citing works

    “…students since the consent demonstrates their ease with the use of data by teachers to enhance their own learn - ing performance (Li et al., 2021 ; Sedenberg & Hoffmann, 2016 ) also highlighted the significance of this consent to show respect towards students and reinforce their autonomy and…”
    Background

Authors
Sedenberg, E., & Hoffmann, A. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Hoffmann, Anna Lauren
ORCID
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2139/ssrn.2837585
OpenAlex
W2519057830
Cited by
10
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of Oxford
  • Center for Long-Term Cybersecurity, University of California Berkeley
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
informed consent, history of informed consent, research ethics, data science ethics, respect for persons, online research, data-intensive research, behavioral research, medical research, information and communication technologies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review