PreprintCited by 3Ethics and bioethics in healthcareHealthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsHealth, Medicine and Society

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assisted Dying for Mental Disorders: Why Canada's Legal Approach Raises Serious Concerns

Open access
Yarascavitch, Alec·2017·SSRN Electronic Journal

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.2139/ssrn.2988535

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. R A Sternbach, 1968, A psychophysiological analysis
  2. 2015, Policy 3-15. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario
  3. 1996, Health Care Consent Act, 10.1002/(sici)1099-1042(199611)4:4<342::aid-hca1197>3.0.co;2-p · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Yarascavitch, A.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Yarascavitch, Alec
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2729710751
Cited by
3
References
12
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
assisted dying, mental illness, Carter v. Canada, capacity assessment, decision-making capacity, physician accountability, right to refuse treatment, vulnerable populations, end-of-life care, mental health system, autonomy and dignity, Canada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review