The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regulating a Revolution: From Regulatory Sandboxes to Smart Regulation
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The distributed liability of distributed ledgers: legal risks of blockchain.
Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., & Arner, D. W. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3018214 · Cited by 127
Self-citation
Cited by
Sustainability, FinTech and Financial Inclusion
Arner, D. W., Buckley, R. P., Zetzsche, D. A., & Veidt, R. (2020) · European Business Organization Law Review · doi:10.1007/s40804-020-00183-y · Cited by 730
Self-citationAnticipatory innovation governance: Shaping the future through proactive policy making
(2020) · OECD Working Papers on Public Governance · doi:10.1787/cce14d80-en · Cited by 303
Experimental Regulations for AI: Sandboxes for Morals and Mores
Ranchordas, S. (2021) · Morals & Machines · doi:10.5771/2747-5182-2021-1-86 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., & Barberis, J. N.
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2753531106
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regulating a Revolution: From Regulatory Sandboxes to Smart Regulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2139/ssrn.3018534
- The paper
- Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., & Barberis, J. N. (2017). Regulating a Revolution: From Regulatory Sandboxes to Smart Regulation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3018534
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
