Cited by 22Digitalization, Law, and RegulationEthics and Social Impacts of AIRegulation and Compliance Studies

Experimental Regulations for AI: Sandboxes for Morals and Mores

Open access
Ranchordas, Sofia·2021·Morals & Machines

Abstract

Recent EU legislative and policy initiatives aim to offer flexible, innovation-friendly, and future-proof regulatory frameworks. Key examples are the EU Coordinated Plan on AI and the recently published EU AI Regulation Proposal which refer to the importance of experimenting with regulatory sandboxes so as to balance innovation in AI against its potential risks. Originally developed in the Fintech sector, regulatory sandboxes create a test bed for a selected number of innovative projects, by waiving otherwise applicable rules, guiding compliance, or customizing enforcement. Despite the burgeoning literature on regulatory sandboxes and the regulation of AI, the legal, methodological, and ethical challenges of these anticipatory or, at times, adaptive regulatory frameworks have remained understudied. This exploratory article delves into the some of the benefits and intricacies of allowing for experimental instruments in the context of the regulation of AI. This article’s contribution is twofold: first, it contextualizes the adoption of regulatory sandboxes in the broader discussion on experimental approaches to regulation; second, it offers a reflection on the steps ahead for the design and implementation of AI regulatory sandboxes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5771/2747-5182-2021-1-86

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The temporary relaxation of legal obligations in sandboxes exposes third parties to heightened risks that would otherwise be mitigated under fully regulated conditions.

    “The temporary relaxation of legal obligations exposes third parties to heightened risks that would otherwise be mitigated under fully regulated conditions (Allen 2020; Knight and Mitchell 2020; Ranchordas 2021).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ranchordas, S.
Venue
Morals & Machines
Publisher
Nomos Verlag
Published
2021
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
86-100
ISSN
2747-5174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4247503958
Cited by
22
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
8.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Morals & Machines (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Regulation and Compliance Studies
Keywords
regulatory sandboxes, AI regulation, experimental regulation, EU AI Act, adaptive regulation, anticipatory regulation, fintech regulation, regulatory design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review