Regulating Online Content Moderation
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI may negatively impact human rights including freedom of expression and privacy.
“In addition, AI may negatively impact human rights including freedom of expression and privacy (Gorwa et al., 2020;Langvardt, 2017).”
From Representation of Libraries in Artificial Intelligence Regulations and Implications for Ethics and Practice (2022) · cites this paper as Langvardt, 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vaccaro, K., Sandvig, C., & Karahalios, K. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3415238 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Contestability For Content Moderation
Vaccaro, K., Xiao, Z., Hamilton, K., & Karahalios, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3476059 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
SoK: Content Moderation in Social Media, from Guidelines to Enforcement, and Research to Practice
Singhal, M., Ling, C., Paudel, P., Thota, P., Kumarswamy, N., Stringhini, G., & Nilizadeh, S. (2023) · 2023 IEEE 8th European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P) · doi:10.1109/eurosp57164.2023.00056 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Bradley, F. (2022) · Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association · doi:10.1080/24750158.2022.2101911 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Decentralized social networks and the future of free speech online
Huang, T. (2024) · Computer Law & Security Review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106059 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Langvardt, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
- Corresponding author
- Langvardt, Kyle
- ORCID
- Langvardt, Kyle
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2751853755
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Freedom of Expression and Defamation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- online content moderation, First Amendment, freedom of expression, social networking sites, platform accountability, automated content moderation, administrative compliance, Facebook, Twitter, Google, Supreme Court
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
