Cited by 83Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityDigital Platforms and EconomicsGame Theory and Applications

Monopoly Without a Monopolist: An Economic Analysis of the Bitcoin Payment System

Open access
Huberman, Gur, Leshno, Jacob, Moallemi, Ciamac C.·2017·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3032375

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huberman, G., Leshno, J., & Moallemi, C. C.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Huberman, Gur
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121737767
Cited by
83
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
Keywords
Bitcoin, payment systems, blockchain, transaction fees, mining infrastructure, protocol design, throughput, monopoly, decentralized platforms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review