Cited by 631Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance

From Mining to Markets: the Evolution of Bitcoin Transaction Fees

Open access
Easley, David, O'Hara, Maureen, Basu, Soumya·2017·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3055380

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Easley, D., O'Hara, M., & Basu, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Cornell University (US)
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017
Volume
134
Issue
1
Pages
91-109
ISSN
  • 0304-405X (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-5068
OpenAlex
W3122067257
Cited by
631
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 1
FWCI
86.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Financial Economics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Keywords
Bitcoin, transaction fees, blockchain, mining rewards, game-theoretic model, waiting time, welfare analysis, structural constraints, user participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review