Cited by 67Political Theory and DemocracyPolitical Conflict and GovernancePolitics and Society in Latin America

Eroding Regimes: What, Where, and When?

Open access
Coppedge, Michael·2017·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3066677

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Populism often drives the dismantling of formal and informal guardrails of liberal democracy, conceived as democratic backsliding.

    “it is precisely the observation that populism often drives the dismantling of formal and informal guardrails of liberal democracy -conceived of as democratic backsliding, i.e., the gradual reversal of democratic standards by incumbent governments (Bermeo, 2016(Bermeo, , 2022;;Coppedge, 2017) -which is seen as particularly dangerous (Levitsky & Way, 2002).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coppedge, M.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
Coppedge, Michael
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767673141
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
Keywords
democratic backsliding, delegative democracy, horizontal accountability, executive concentration of power, political repression, civil liberties, political discourse, Venezuela, Guillermo O'Donnell

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review