Cited by 106Corporate Finance and GovernanceLaw, Economics, and Judicial SystemsRegulation and Compliance Studies

The Limits of Limited Liability: Evidence from Industrial Pollution

Open access
Akey, Pat, Appel, Ian·2017·SSRN Electronic Journal

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3083013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 6 · Cited by 106

Authors
Akey, P., & Appel, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Akey, Pat
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2771208851
Cited by
106
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Regulation and Compliance Studies
Keywords
limited liability, subsidiaries, industrial pollution, toxic emissions, environmental cleanup costs, corporate insolvency, executive compensation, moral hazard, Supreme Court decision, corporate governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review