Cited by 107Populism, Right-Wing MovementsElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationMigration, Refugees, and Integration

Economic Distress and Support for Far-Right Parties - Evidence from Sweden

Open access
Dehdari, Sirus·2018·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

This paper studies the effects of economic distress on support for radical right parties. Using Swedish election data, I show that one layoff notice among low-skilled native-born workers increases, on average, support for the Swedish radical right party the Sweden Democrats by 0.17–0.45 votes. The relationship between layoff notices and support for the Sweden Democrats is stronger in areas with a high share of low-skilled immigrants and in areas with a low share of high-skilled immigrants. These findings are in line with theories suggesting that economically distressed voters oppose immigration as they fear increased labor market competition. In addition, I use individual-level survey data to show that self-reported unemployment risk is positively associated with voting for the Sweden Democrats among low-skilled respondents while the opposite is true for high-skilled respondents, echoing the aggregate-level findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3160480

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EU regions more exposed to the Great Recession have seen a greater rise in voting for anti-establishment, euro-skeptic parties.

    “Today, French and German regions more exposed to trade with low-wage countries have seen larger increases in vote shares for the far right (Dippel et al. 2017; Malgouyres 2017), British regions more exposed to trade with China voted more strongly in favor of Brexit (Colantone and Stanig 2018a), and EU regions more exposed to the Great Recession have seen a greater rise in voting for anti-establish”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dehdari, S.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Dehdari, Sirus
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
191-221
ISSN
  • 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-5068
OpenAlex
W3176670795
Cited by
107
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
23.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Comparative Political Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Jan Wallanders och Tom Hedelius Stiftelse samt Tore Browaldhs Stiftelse
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Keywords
economic hardship, radical right parties, Sweden Democrats, low-skilled workers, immigration attitudes, labor market competition, unemployment risk, low-skilled immigrants, highly skilled migrants, voting behavior, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review