Economic Distress and Support for Far-Right Parties - Evidence from Sweden
Open accessAbstract
This paper studies the effects of economic distress on support for radical right parties. Using Swedish election data, I show that one layoff notice among low-skilled native-born workers increases, on average, support for the Swedish radical right party the Sweden Democrats by 0.17–0.45 votes. The relationship between layoff notices and support for the Sweden Democrats is stronger in areas with a high share of low-skilled immigrants and in areas with a low share of high-skilled immigrants. These findings are in line with theories suggesting that economically distressed voters oppose immigration as they fear increased labor market competition. In addition, I use individual-level survey data to show that self-reported unemployment risk is positively associated with voting for the Sweden Democrats among low-skilled respondents while the opposite is true for high-skilled respondents, echoing the aggregate-level findings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EU regions more exposed to the Great Recession have seen a greater rise in voting for anti-establishment, euro-skeptic parties.
“Today, French and German regions more exposed to trade with low-wage countries have seen larger increases in vote shares for the far right (Dippel et al. 2017; Malgouyres 2017), British regions more exposed to trade with China voted more strongly in favor of Brexit (Colantone and Stanig 2018a), and EU regions more exposed to the Great Recession have seen a greater rise in voting for anti-establish”
From Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure (2020) · cites this paper as Dehdari 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure
Autor, D., Dorn, D., Hanson, G., & Majlesi, K. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20170011 · Cited by 1,063 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dehdari, S.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Dehdari, Sirus
- ORCID
- Dehdari, Sirus
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 191-221
- ISSN
- 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-5068
- OpenAlex
- W3176670795
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 23.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Comparative Political Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Jan Wallanders och Tom Hedelius Stiftelse samt Tore Browaldhs Stiftelse
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Keywords
- economic hardship, radical right parties, Sweden Democrats, low-skilled workers, immigration attitudes, labor market competition, unemployment risk, low-skilled immigrants, highly skilled migrants, voting behavior, Sweden
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review