When Ostrom Meets Blockchain: Exploring the Potentials of Blockchain for Commons Governance
Open accessAbstract
Blockchain technologies have generated enthusiasm, yet their potential to enable new forms of governance remains largely unexplored. Two confronting standpoints dominate the emergent debate around blockchain-based governance: discourses characterised by the presence of techno-determinist and market-driven values, which tend to ignore the complexity of social organisation; and critical accounts of such discourses which, whilst contributing to identifying limitations, consider the role of traditional centralised institutions as inherently necessary to enable democratic forms of governance. In this article, we draw on Ostrom’s principles for self-governance of communities to explore the transformative potential of blockchain beyond such standpoints. We approach blockchain through the identification and conceptualisation of six affordances that this technology may provide to communities: tokenisation, formalisation and decentralisation of rules, autonomous automatisation, decentralisation of power over the infrastructure, increasing transparency and codification of trust. For each affordance, we carry out a detailed analysis situating each in the context of Ostrom’s principles, considering both the potentials of algorithmic governance and the importance of incorporating communities’ social practices into blockchain-based tools to foster forms of self-governance. The relationships found between these affordances and Ostrom’s principles allow us to provide a perspective focussed on…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These are two different strategies to governing money-reliance on the technology the first, on the community the second; coding standardizing rules in the blockchain ex-ante the first, adapting the rules as issues emerge ex-post the later.
“These are two different strategies to governing money—reliance on the technology the first, on the community the second; coding standardizing rules in the blockchain ex-ante the first, adapting the rules as issues emerge ex-post the later (Rozas et al., 2018).”
From A Route to Commons-Based Democratic Monies? Embedding the Governance of Money in Traditional Communal Institutions (2020) · cites this paper as Rozas et al., 2018
In the engineering world of code, standardized rules translate into algorithms programmed ex-ante, before communities are even given the opportunity to articulate their priorities and idiosyncrasies.
“In the engineering world of code, standardized rules translate into algorithms programmed ex-ante (Rozas et al., 2018), before communities are even given the opportunity to articulate their priorities and idiosyncrasies.”
From A Route to Commons-Based Democratic Monies? Embedding the Governance of Money in Traditional Communal Institutions (2020) · cites this paper as Rozas et al., 2018
Cites
The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-0999 · Cited by 1,903 · see citing works
Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications
(2010) · A Networked Self · doi:10.4324/9780203876527-8 · Cited by 1,724 · see citing works
Laboratories of Oligarchy? How the Iron Law Extends to Peer Production
Shaw, A., & Hill, B. M. (2014) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12082 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barinaga, E. (2020) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2020.575851 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rozas, D., Tenorio-Fornés, A., Díaz-Molina, S., & Hassan, S.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Rozas, David
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2158-2440 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-5068
- OpenAlex
- W2906180434
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 16.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- SAGE Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Docta Complutense (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (RTI2018-096820-A-100, RTI2018)
- Universitat de València
- H2020 European Research Council (759207)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Social Sciences and Governance
- Keywords
- blockchain, commons governance, self-government, algorithmic governance, tokenization, decentralization, transparency, community governance, technological determinism, democratic governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review