PreprintCited by 5Hate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionSpam and Phishing DetectionBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Detection of Cyberhectoring on Instagram

Open access
Patange, Tanmayee, Singh, Jigyasa, Thorve, Aishwarya, Somaraj, Yadnyashree, Vyawahare, Madhura·2019·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3362158

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other research examined cyberbullying using Caffe, Deeplearning4j, and MXNet.

    “We have also observed other research that examined cyberbullying by using different frameworks, such as Caffe [187], Deeplearning4j [188], and MXNet [178].”

    From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [187]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patange, T., Singh, J., Thorve, A., Somaraj, Y., & Vyawahare, M.
Affiliations
University of Mumbai (IN)
Corresponding author
Singh, Jigyasa
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3163014972
Cited by
5
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
cyberbullying detection, Instagram, social media comments, image content analysis, swearing, linguistic features, adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review