CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 39Populism, Right-Wing MovementsPolitical Theory and DemocracyPolitical Conflict and Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Democracy and Populism: Testing a Contentious Relationship

Open access
Ruth-Lovell, Saskia P., Lührmann, Anna, Grahn, Sandra·2019·SSRN Electronic Journal
DOI 10.2139/ssrn.3471132
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3471132

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ruth-Lovell, S. P., Lührmann, A., & Grahn, S.
Affiliations
  • German Institute for Global and Area Studies (DE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Ruth-Lovell, Saskia P.
ORCID
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2139/ssrn.3471132
OpenAlex
W2989396120
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • H2020 European Research Council (724191)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
populism, democracy, democratic model, populist governments, V-Dem, Europe, Latin America, political regimes, democratic backsliding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review