PreprintCited by 11Cognitive Abilities and TestingEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

The Impact of Working Memory Training on Children’s Cognitive and Noncognitive Skills

Open access
Berger, Eva M., Fehr, Ernst, Hermes, Henning, Schunk, Daniel, Winkel, Kirsten·2020·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3622337

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berger, E. M., Fehr, E., Hermes, H., Schunk, D., & Winkel, K.
Affiliations
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Berger, Eva M.
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4243666038
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
working memory training, working memory capacity, fluid intelligence, geometry skills, reading skills, self-regulation, early childhood education, first grade students, long-term educational outcomes, non-cognitive skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review