Cited by 86Policing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and Penology

An Abolitionist Horizon for Police (Reform)

Open access
Akbar, Amna·2020·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3670952

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 2020 murder of George Floyd accelerated efforts to rethink public safety, spurring a wave of crisis response programs.

    “The 2020 murder of George Floyd accelerated efforts to rethink public safety (Akbar, 2020;Kaba et al., 2021;Phelps, 2024), spurring a wave of crisis response programs aimed at reducing police involvement in mental health, substance use, and quality-of-life emergencies.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akbar, A.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Akbar, Amna
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020
Volume
108
Issue
6
Pages
1781
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3167702143
Cited by
85
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • California Law Review
  • UC Berkeley
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
police reform, prison abolition, police brutality, defund the police, George Floyd, Black Lives Matter, police legitimacy, collective care, social provision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review