Cited by 15Global trade and economicsEconomic Growth and ProductivitySpatial and Panel Data Analysis

Gravity-Model Estimation with Time-Interval Data: Revisiting the Impact of Free Trade Agreements

Open access
Egger, Peter H., Larch, Mario, Yotov, Yoto·2020·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3699232

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Egger, P. H., Larch, M., & Yotov, Y.
Affiliations
  • Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE)
  • Drexel University (US)
Corresponding author
Egger, Peter H.
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087803358
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Keywords
gravity model, free trade agreements, trade policy effects, dynamic adjustment, event study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review