Efficacy and safety of a COVID-19 inactivated vaccine in healthcare professionals in Brazil: the PROFISCOV Study
Open accessAbstract
Background: Vaccines are urgently needed to tackle the unprecedented morbidity and mortality of COVID-19. Administration of inactivated viruses are the common and mature platform of developing new vaccines. CoronaVac is an inactivated vaccine that has undergone preclinical tests and phase I/II clinical trials. Methods: We conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial with CoronaVac among healthy healthcare professionals in 16 centres in Brazil. Participants received two doses of vaccine (3 μg in 0.5 mL) vaccine or placebo at day 0 and 14. The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of symptomatic COVID-19 cases confirmed by RT-PCR 14 days after the second dose of the vaccine. Prevention of disease severity was a major secondary efficacy endpoint, and adverse events incidence up to seven days after immunization was the primary safety outcome. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04456595. Findings: Between July 21 and Dec 16, 2020, 12 396 participants were enrolled and received at least one vaccine or placebo dose. There were 9,823 participants who received the two doses and were followed for at least 14 days and had, therefore, reached the final efficacy analysis. There were 253 confirmed COVID-19 cases in the cohort: 85 cases (11.0/100 person-year) among 4,953 participants in the vaccine group, and 168 cases (22·3/100 person-year) among 4,870 participants in the placebo group. The primary efficacy against symptomatic COVID-19…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Palacios and colleagues reported an overall efficacy of CoronaVac against symptomatic COVID-19 of 50.7% (95% CI 36.0-62.0) 14 days or more after the second dose.
“Palacios and colleagues22 reported an overall efficacy of CoronaVac against symptomatic COVID-19 of 50·7% (95% CI 36·0–62·0) 14 days or more after the second dose”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tanriover, M. D., Doğanay, H. L., Akova, M., Güner, H. R., Azap, A., Akhan, S., Köse, Ş., Erdinç, F. Ş., Akalın, E. H., Tabak, Ö. F., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01429-x · Cited by 898 · see citing works
Au, W. Y., & Cheung, P. P.-H. (2022) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-069989 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
- Authors
- Palacios, R., Batista, A. P., Albuquerque, C. S. N., Patiño, E. G., Santos, J. D. P., Tilli Reis Pessoa Conde, M., Piorelli, R. D. O., Pereira Júnior, L. C., Raboni, S. M., Ramos, F., Sierra Romero, G. A., Leal, F. E., Camargo, L. F. A., Aoki, F. H., Coelho, E. B., Oliveira, D. S., Fontes, C. J. F., Pileggi, G. C. S., Oliveira, A. L. L. D., Siqueira, A. M. D., Oliveira, D. B. L. D., Botosso, V. F., Zeng, G., Xin, Q., Teixeira, M. M., Nogueira, M. L., & Kallas, E. G.
- Affiliations
- Instituto Butantan (BR)
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul (BR)
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Universidade Federal de Pelotas (BR)
- Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (BR)
- Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (BR)
- Sinovac Biotech (CN)
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
- Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Palacios, Ricardo
- ORCID
- Palacios, Ricardo
- Batista, Ana Paula
- Patiño, Elizabeth González
- Piorelli, Roberta de Oliveira
- Ramos, Fabiano
- Sierra Romero, Gustavo Adolfo
- Aoki, Francisco Hideo
- Coelho, Eduardo Barbosa
- Fontes, Cor Jesus Fernandes
- Pileggi, Gecilmara Cristina Salviato
- Oliveira, Ana Lúcia Lyrio de
- Siqueira, André Machado de
- Oliveira, Danielle Bruna Leal de
- Botosso, Viviane Fongaro
- Zeng, Gang
- Xin, Qianqian
- Teixeira, Mauro Martins
- Nogueira, Maurício Lacerda
- Kallas, Esper Georges
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3153401228
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 58
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Keywords
- CoronaVac, SARS-CoV-2, vaccine efficacy, vaccine safety, healthcare workers, disease severity, adverse events, Brazil, COVID-19 vaccination program, SARS-CoV-2 variants, Omicron BA.1, Omicron BA.2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review