PreprintCited by 17SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Efficacy and Safety of the CVnCoV SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Candidate: Results from Herald, a Phase 2b/3, Randomised, Observer-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial in Ten Countries in Europe and Latin America

Open access
Kremsner, Peter G., Guerrero, Rodolfo Andrés Ahuad, Arana, Eunate, Aroca Martinez, Gustavo Jose, Bonten, Marc J.M., Chandler, Reynaldo, Corral, Gonzalo, De Block, Eddie Jan Louis +29 more·2021·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

Background: Additional safe and effective vaccines are needed to control the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: HERALD is an ongoing phase 2b/3 randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial in ten countries in Europe and Latin America. SARS-CoV-2 naïve adults were randomised 1:1 to receive two doses of CVnCoV mRNA vaccine candidate or placebo 28 days apart. Primary efficacy analysis included symptomatic COVID-19 more than 14 days after second dose. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were assessed in phase 2b participants and unsolicited AEs in all participants. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04652102). Findings: Between 11 December 2020 and 12 April 2021, 39 680 participants were randomised and 39 529 received CVnCoV (19 783) or placebo (19 746). Overall VE was 48·2% (95% CI: 31·0–61·4; 83/12 851 vs. 145/12 221 in CVnCoV and placebo recipients, respectively). Overall VE against moderate-to-severe COVID-19 was 70·7% (95% CI: 42·5–86·1; 12/12 851 vs. 37/12 211, respectively). In participants aged 18–60 years VE was 52·5% (95% CI: 36·2–64·8; 71/11 532 vs. 136/11 031, respectively). Too few cases occurred in participants aged ≥61 years (CVnCoV: 12, placebo: 9) precluding VE evaluation. Wild type SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 7/204 (3%) sequenced cases, with 14 variants being responsible for the other cases. Solicited adverse events, mostly systemic, were more common in CVnCoV recipients; 542/2002 CVnCoV recipients and 61/1980 placebo recipients reported grade 3 events. Unsolicited serious AEs were reported for 82/19 746 CVnCoV recipients and 66/19 746 placebo recipients; 8 and 2 SAEs, respectively were considered related to vaccination. Fatal SAEs were reported for 8 and 6 CVnCoV and placebo recipients. Interpretation: CVnCoV is efficacious in the prevention of COVID-19 of any severity and has an acceptable safety profile. Trial Registration: Study number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04652102. Funding: This trial was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant 01KI20703), and CureVac AG. Declaration of Interest: MB declares institutional funding from CureVac during the conduct of this study, from Janssen Vaccines, molecular partners, and Merck outside of the submitted work, and consulting fees from Janssen Vaccines. EJLDB, and MFMR, TO and XSL declare institutional funding from CureVac during the conduct of this study. LE, and LG declare institutional funding from CureVac during the conduct of this study and outside of the submitted work. CFL declares institutional funding from CureVac during the conduct of this study, and outside of the submitted work, and is a member of WHO Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Working Group and WHO Product Development for Vaccines Advisory Committee (PDVAC). CL declares institutional funding from CureVac during the conduct of this study, and is a member of the of German Society of Infection board. ILR declares institutional funding from CureVac during the conduct of this study and from J &J, and OSE Immunotherapeutics outside of the submitted work. PGK declares institutional funding from CureVac during the conduct of this study, and is a member of the scientific advisory board for the HERALD clinical trial. VVRH declares institutional funding from CureVac during the conduct of this study, and speakers fees from Gilead outside of the submitted work. HJ declares consultant fees from CureVac, is the Medical Responsible Person for the HERALD clinical trial, and is co-chair of DSMB for the HERALD clinical trial. AK and PM are employed by CureVac, and hold stock options. OSK declares consultant fees from CureVac during the conduct of this study, and is a member of the DSMB for a CVnCoV phase 1 trial. TV declares consultant fees from CureVac during the conduct of this study, and consultant fees from CureVac, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Johnson&Johnson, and Moderna outside of the submitted work. LO is employed by CureVac, and holds stock options, and is the holder of a pending patent. The other authors declare no competing interests. Ethical Approval: The trial protocol and amendments have been approved by the appropriate independent ethics committee or institutional review board at each study centre

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3911826

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the HERALD trial, observed vaccine efficacy against symptomatic COVID-19 was approximately 48% in the overall study population and 53% in participants 18-60 years of age.

    “In this trial, the observed vaccine efficacy against symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was approximately 48% and 53% in the overall study population and in a subgroup of participants 18–60 years of age, respectively1.”
  • The CVnCoV mRNA vaccine was evaluated in a phase 2b/3 efficacy trial in humans.

    “The CVnCoV (CureVac) mRNA vaccine for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was recently evaluated in a phase 2b/3 efficacy trial in humans1.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kremsner, P. G., Guerrero, R. A. A., Arana, E., Aroca Martinez, G. J., Bonten, M. J. M., Chandler, R., Corral, G., De Block, E. J. L., Ecker, L., Gabor, J. J., Garcia Lopez, C. A., Gonzales, L., Granados González, M. A., Gorini, N., Grobusch, M. P., Hrabar, A. D., Junker, H., Kimura, A., Lanata, C. F., Lehmann, C., Leroux-Roels, I., Mann, P., Martinez-Reséndez, M. F., Ochoa, T., Poy, C. A., Reyes Fentanes, M. J., Mejia, L. M. R., Ruiz Herrera, V. V., Sáez-Llorens, X., Schönborn-Kellenberger, O., Schunk, M., Garcia, A. S., Vergara, I., Verstraeten, T., Vico, M., Oostvogels, L., & Group, H. S.
Affiliations
  • Centre de Recherche Médicales de Lambaréné (GA)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • CEVAXIN (PA)
  • Instituto de Investigación Nutricional (PE)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Hospital Zonal General De Agudos Descentralizado "Evita Pueblo" (AR)
  • CureVac (Germany) (DE)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (PE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute (ES)
Corresponding author
Kremsner, Peter G.
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3197619167
Cited by
17
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, vaccine safety, vaccine adverse events, moderate to severe COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 variants, vaccine hesitancy, booster vaccination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review