The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Economic Freedom of the World - 2021 Annual Report
Abstract
The index published in Economic Freedom of the World measures the degree to which the policies and institutions of countries are supportive of economic freedom. The cornerstones of economic freedom are personal choice, voluntary exchange, freedom to enter markets and compete, and security of the person and privately owned property. Forty-two data points are used to construct a summary index, along with a Gender Legal Rights Adjustment to measure the extent to which women have the same level of economic freedom as men. The degree of economic freedom is measured in five broad areas: Size of Government: As government spending, taxation, and the size of government-controlled enterprises increase, government decision-making is substituted for individual choice and economic freedom is reduced. Legal System and Property Rights: Protection of persons and their rightfully acquired property is a central element of both economic freedom and civil society. Indeed, it is the most important function of government. Sound Money: Inflation erodes the value of rightfully earned wages and savings. Sound money is thus essential to protect property rights. When inflation is not only high but also volatile, it becomes difficult for individuals to plan for the future and thus use economic freedom effectively. Freedom to Trade Internationally: Freedom to exchange – in its broadest sense, buying, selling, making contracts, and so on – is essential to economic freedom, which is reduced when freedom to exchange does not include businesses and individuals in other nations. Regulation: Governments not only use a number of tools to limit the right to exchange internationally, they may also impose onerous regulations that limit the right to exchange, gain credit, hire or work for whom you wish, or freely operate your business. Since the Fraser Institute’s first publication in 1996, numerous studies have used the data published in Economic Freedom of the World to examine the impact of economic freedom on investment, economic growth, income levels, and poverty rates. Virtually without exception, these studies have found that countries with institutions and policies more consistent with economic freedom have higher investment rates, more rapid economic growth, higher income levels, and a more rapid reduction in poverty rates. The most recent comprehensive data available are from 2019. Hong Kong remains in the top position. The apparent increased insecurity of property rights and the weakening of the rule of law caused by the interventions of the Chinese government during 2020 and 2021 will likely have a negative impact on Hong Kong’s score, especially in Area 2, Legal System and Property Rights, going forward. Singapore, once again, comes in second. The next highest scoring nations are New Zealand, Switzerland, Georgia, United States, Ireland, Lithuania, Australia, and Denmark. Rankings of other major countries The rankings of some other major countries are Canada (14th), Japan (18th), Germany (22nd), Italy (47th), France (53rd), Mexico (75th), Russia (100th), India (108th), Brazil (109th), and China (116th). Ten lowest-rated countries The ten lowest-rated countries are: Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Syria, Republic of Congo, Iran, Zimbabwe, Algeria, Libya, Sudan, and, lastly, Venezuela. Nations that are economically free out-perform non-free nations in indicators of well-being. In the top quartile, the average income of the poorest 10 per cent was $14,400, compared to $1,549 in the bottom quartile (PPP constant 2017, international$). Interestingly, the average income of the poorest 10 per cent in the most economically free nations is more than twice the average per-capita income in the least free nations. In the top quartile, 0.9. per cent of the population experience extreme poverty (US$1.90 a day) compared to 34.1 per cent in the lowest quartile. Life expectancy is 81.1 years in the top quartile compared to 65.9 years in the bottom quartile.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The son also rises: surnames and the history of social mobility
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-7043 · Cited by 452
Fair Progress?: Economic Mobility across Generations around the World
Narayan, A., Van der Weide, R., Cojocaru, A., Lakner, C., Redaelli, S., Mahler, D. G., Ramasubbaiah, R. G. N., & Thewissen, S. (2018) · doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1210-1 · Cited by 325
Cited by
Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization
Dreher, A. (2006) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036840500392078 · Cited by 3,178
Economic Freedom and the Motivation to Engage in Entrepreneurial Action
McMullen, J. S., Bagby, D. R., & Palich, L. E. (2008) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00260.x · Cited by 668
Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics
(2026) · Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics · doi:10.5897/jdae · Cited by 465
How Does Social Trust Affect Economic Growth?
Bjørnskov, C. (2012) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.4284/0038-4038-78.4.1346 · Cited by 357
(2006) · OECD Economics Department Working Papers · doi:10.1787/362886816127 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., Hall, J., & Murphy, R.
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 1556-5068
- OpenAlex
- W2351445426
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Economic Freedom of the World - 2021 Annual Report. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2139/ssrn.3924422
- The paper
- Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., Hall, J., & Murphy, R. (2023). Economic Freedom of the World - 2021 Annual Report. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3924422
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.