Cited by 6Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureSmart Grid Energy ManagementElectric Power System Optimization

Computationally Efficient Joint Coordination of Multiple Electric Vehicle Charging Points Using Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Lahariya, Manu, Sadeghianpourhamami, Nasrin, Develder, Chris·2022·SSRN Electronic Journal

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.4090508

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Advanced optimization- or machine-learning-based schedulers require extensive computational resources and forecasting precision, making them less accessible to DSOs seeking near-term deployment.

    “Second, advanced optimization-or machine-learning-based schedulers (for example, those discussed in [12,13]) require extensive computational resources and forecasting precision, making them less accessible to DSOs seeking near-term deployment.”

    From A Multi-Agent, Laxity-Based Aggregation Strategy for Cost-Effective Electric Vehicle Charging and Local Transformer Overload Prevention (2025) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Abstract says computational challenges could limit deployment of an earlier reinforcement-learning approach, and the Introduction says model-based demand-response algorithms face model uncertainty and scalability limits. The paper also presents a more computationally efficient scheduler, so it does not establish that advanced schedulers generally require extensive resources. It does not establish a need for forecasting precision or discuss near-term accessibility to DSOs. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. N. Dkhili, J. Eynard, S. Thil, S. Grieu, A survey of modelling and smart management tools for power grids with prolific distributed gen- eration, Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks 21 (2020) 100284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2019.100284. · DOI
  2. D. Dongol, T. Feldmann, M. Schmidt, E. Bollin, A model predictive control based peak shaving application of battery for a household with photovoltaic system in a rural distribution grid, Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks 16 (2018) 1-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. segan.2018.05.001. · DOI
  3. N. Sadeghianpourhamami, T. Demeester, D. F. Benoit, M. Strobbe, C. Develder, Modeling and analysis of residential flexibility: Timing of white good usage, Applied energy 179 (2016) 790-805. doi:10. 1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.012. · DOI
  4. T. A. Nakabi, P. Toivanen, Deep reinforcement learning for energy management in a microgrid with flexible demand, Sustainable En- ergy, Grids and Networks 25 (2021) 100413. doi:https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.segan.2020.100413. · DOI
  5. N. Sadeghianpourhamami, J. Deleu, C. Develder, Definition and eval- uation of model-free coordination of electrical vehicle charging with reinforcement learning, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid (2019). doi:10.1109/TSG.2019.2920320. · DOI · Paper page
  6. T. M. Hansen, E. K. P. Chong, S. Suryanarayanan, A. A. Maciejewski, H. J. Siegel, A partially observable markov decision process approach to residential home energy management, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 9 (2018) 1271-1281. doi:10.1109/TSG.2016.2582701. · DOI
  7. M. van Otterlo, M. Wiering, Reinforcement Learning and Markov Decision Processes, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 3-42. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27645-3_1. · DOI
  8. D. O'Neill, M. Levorato, A. Goldsmith, U. Mitra, Residential de- mand response using reinforcement learning, in: 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, 2010, pp. 409-414. doi:10.1109/SMARTGRID.2010.5622078. · DOI
  9. B. Bibak, H. Tekiner-Mogulkoc, The parametric analysis of the elec- tric vehicles and vehicle to grid system's role in flattening the power demand, Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks 30 (2022) 100605. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2022.100605. · DOI
  10. M. Lahariya, N. Sadeghianpourhamami, C. Develder, Reduced state space and cost function in reinforcement learning for demand re- sponse control of multiple ev charging stations, in: Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy- Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation, BuildSys '19, 2019, p. 344-345. doi:10.1145/3360322.3360992. · DOI
  11. N. Chen, T. Q. S. Quek, C. W. Tan, Optimal charging of elec- tric vehicles in smart grid: Characterization and valley-filling algo- rithms, in: 2012 IEEE Third International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), 2012, pp. 13-18. doi:10.1109/ SmartGridComm.2012.6485952. · DOI
  12. A. Chiş, J. Lundén, V. Koivunen, Reinforcement learning-based plug- in electric vehicle charging with forecasted price, IEEE Transac- tions on Vehicular Technology 66 (2017) 3674-3684. doi:10.1109/ TVT.2016.2603536. · DOI
  13. W. Shi, V. W. S. Wong, et al., Real-time vehicle-to-grid control algo- rithm under price uncertainty, in: 2011 IEEE International Confer- ence on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), 2011, pp. 261-266. doi:10.1109/SmartGridComm.2011.6102330. · DOI
  14. M. Riedmiller, Neural fitted q iteration -first experiences with a data efficient neural reinforcement learning method, in: Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Machine Learning, ECML'05, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005, p. 317-328. doi:10.1007/ 11564096_32. · DOI
  15. S. Vandael, B. Claessens, M. Hommelberg, T. Holvoet, G. Deconinck, A scalable three-step approach for demand side management of plug- in hybrid vehicles, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 4 (2013) 720- 728. doi:10.1109/TSG.2012.2213847. · DOI
  16. B. J. Claessens, S. Vandael, F. Ruelens, K. De Craemer, B. Beusen, Peak shaving of a heterogeneous cluster of residential flexibility car- riers using reinforcement learning, in: IEEE PES ISGT Europe 2013, 2013, pp. 1-5. doi:10.1109/ISGTEurope.2013.6695254. · DOI
  17. J. Vuelvas, F. Ruiz, G. Gruosso, A time-of-use pricing strategy for managing electric vehicle clusters, Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks 25 (2021) 100411. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan. 2020.100411. · DOI
  18. B. J. Claessens, P. Vrancx, F. Ruelens, Convolutional neural networks for automatic state-time feature extraction in reinforcement learning applied to residential load control, CoRR abs/1604.08382 (2016). arXiv:1604.08382. · arXiv
  19. N. Sadeghianpourhamami, N. Refa, M. Strobbe, C. Develder, Quan- titive analysis of electric vehicle flexibility: A data-driven approach, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 95 (2018) 451-462. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2017.09.007. · DOI · Paper page
  20. M. Riedmiller, 10 Steps and Some Tricks to Set up Neural Rein- forcement Controllers, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidel- berg, 2012, pp. 735-757. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8_39. · DOI
  21. P. J. Huber, Robust Estimation of a Location Parameter, The An- nals of Mathematical Statistics 35 (1964) 73 -101. doi:10.1214/aoms/ 1177703732. · DOI · Paper page
  22. V. Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. A. Rusu, J. Veness, M. G. Bellemare, A. Graves, M. Riedmiller, A. K. Fidjeland, G. Ostrovski, S. Petersen, C. Beattie, A. Sadik, I. Antonoglou, H. King, D. Ku- maran, D. Wierstra, S. Legg, D. Hassabis, Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning, Nature 518 (2015) 529-533. doi:10.1038/nature14236. · DOI · Paper page
  23. M. Lahariya, D. F. Benoit, C. Develder, Synthetic data generator for electric vehicle charging sessions: Modeling and evaluation us- ing real-world data, Energies 13 (2020). doi:10.3390/en13164211. · DOI

Cited by

Authors
Lahariya, M., Sadeghianpourhamami, N., & Develder, C.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Lahariya, Manu
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293219589
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
European Commission (HORIZON2020, 957816, 957845)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
Keywords
electric vehicle charging, demand response, coordinated charging, reinforcement learning, Markov decision process, computational efficiency, peak shaving, grid flexibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review