Explainable AI in Farming: Configurations of Human-AI Joint Decision-Making
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The deployment of XAI accounts for the experience and authority of farmers, and comprehension increases farmers' trust in AI systems and makes them more effective.
“The deployment of XAI accounts for the experience and authority of the farmers and comprehension increases the farmer's trust in AI systems and makes them more effective [64].”
From Recent Emerging Techniques in Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Enhance the Interpretable and Understanding of AI Models for Human (2025) · cites this paper as [64]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mathew, D. E., Ebem, D. U., Ikegwu, A. C., Ukeoma, P. E., & Dibiaezue, N. F. (2025) · Neural Processing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11063-025-11732-2 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
“The deployment of XAI accounts for the experience and authority of the farmers and comprehension increases the farmer’s trust in AI systems and makes them more effective [64].”
AI in Current and Future Agriculture: An Introductory Overview
Kisliuk, B., Krause, J. C., Meemken, H., et al. (2023) · Künstliche Intell. · doi:10.1007/s13218-023-00826-5 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“…high level of responsibility in dealing with animals, and the degree of clarity and comprehensibility in the decision-making component of AI approaches is not only important for increasing acceptance [74], but it also allows humans to recognise and honour their responsibility towards farm animals.”
- Authors
- Hüllmann, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Münster (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Hüllmann, Joschka Andreas
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W6903914549
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Keywords
- explainable AI, agricultural decision support, human-AI collaboration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
