PreprintCited by 58Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

ChatGPT for Next Generation Science Learning

Open access
Zhai, Xiaoming·2023·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

The K-12 Framework for Science Education set forth a vision for Next Generation Science Learning, which is to engage students in scientific practices to learn and use disciplinary core ideas and crosscutting concepts. This vision posits significant challenges in terms of how to track students' learning, provide feedback and learning guidance, recommend learning materials, and meet the special needs of students with diverse backgrounds. This study pilots ChatGPT in meeting these challenges. I used one performance expectation of the Next Generation Science Standards to develop a prompt, using which ChatGPT automatically generates a performance-based assessment task. I supplied a response and asked ChatGPT to grade and provide feedback. I then asked ChatGPT to provide learning guidance and learning materials based on the response. At last, I told ChatGPT that the learner was with dyslexia, and eventually ChatGPT recommended specific learning materials for the learner. Results suggest that ChatGPT has the potential to tackle the most challenging problems of science learning through automatic assessment development, automatic grading, automatic learning guidance, and automatic recommendation of learning materials. Even with exciting findings, this study suggests that ChatGPT cannot substitute teachers. Teachers need professional knowledge to use ChatGPT for instructional purposes. Further, the BlackBox of ChatGPT, in terms of how it generates automatic results, needs to be explainable so that students, teachers, and parents can fully appreciate its merit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.4331313

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 58

Authors
Zhai, X.
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4318480626
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
ChatGPT, Next Generation Science Standards, K-12 science education, automated grading, performance-based assessment, feedback in learning, personalized learning content, learning material recommendation, dyslexia, inclusive education, teacher professional knowledge, explainable AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review