ChatGPT for Next Generation Science Learning
Open accessAbstract
The K-12 Framework for Science Education set forth a vision for Next Generation Science Learning, which is to engage students in scientific practices to learn and use disciplinary core ideas and crosscutting concepts. This vision posits significant challenges in terms of how to track students' learning, provide feedback and learning guidance, recommend learning materials, and meet the special needs of students with diverse backgrounds. This study pilots ChatGPT in meeting these challenges. I used one performance expectation of the Next Generation Science Standards to develop a prompt, using which ChatGPT automatically generates a performance-based assessment task. I supplied a response and asked ChatGPT to grade and provide feedback. I then asked ChatGPT to provide learning guidance and learning materials based on the response. At last, I told ChatGPT that the learner was with dyslexia, and eventually ChatGPT recommended specific learning materials for the learner. Results suggest that ChatGPT has the potential to tackle the most challenging problems of science learning through automatic assessment development, automatic grading, automatic learning guidance, and automatic recommendation of learning materials. Even with exciting findings, this study suggests that ChatGPT cannot substitute teachers. Teachers need professional knowledge to use ChatGPT for instructional purposes. Further, the BlackBox of ChatGPT, in terms of how it generates automatic results, needs to be explainable so that students, teachers, and parents can fully appreciate its merit.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lecturers can ask ChatGPT to formulate suggestions to design a course that is more accessible to students with disabilities.
“More generally, lecturers can also ask ChatGPT to formulate suggestions to design a course that is more accessible to students with disabilities (Zhai, 2023).”
From Exploring the role of generative AI in higher education: Semi-structured interviews with students with disabilities (2025) · cites this paper as Zhai, 2023
ChatGPT seems to provide correct answers to support students with disabilities in higher education.
“ChatGPT seems to provide correct answers to support students with disabilities in higher education (Zhai, 2023).”
From Exploring the role of generative AI in higher education: Semi-structured interviews with students with disabilities (2025) · cites this paper as Zhai, 2023
Students believe ChatGPT could potentially be used to inform lecturers about the creation of accessible courses.
“the results highlight that students believe ChatGPT could potentially be used to inform lecturers about the creation of accessible courses as suggested in Zhai (2023).”
From Exploring the role of generative AI in higher education: Semi-structured interviews with students with disabilities (2025) · cites this paper as Zhai (2023)
Most existing research focuses on the general capabilities, opportunities, and risks of using LLMs in education rather than systematically evaluating the quality of the learning content they generate.
“Most existing research focuses on the general capabilities, opportunities, and risks of using LLMs in education rather than systematically evaluating the quality of the learning content they generate [4,10,16].”
From An Integrated AHP–Fuzzy AHP Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models in Software Engineering Education (2026) · cites this paper as [16]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 58
- Authors
- Zhai, X.
- ORCID
- Zhai, Xiaoming
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4318480626
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, Next Generation Science Standards, K-12 science education, automated grading, performance-based assessment, feedback in learning, personalized learning content, learning material recommendation, dyslexia, inclusive education, teacher professional knowledge, explainable AI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review