CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 56Academic integrity and plagiarismArtificial Intelligence in EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AI

ChatGPT and Academic Integrity

Open access
Shiri, Ali·2023·SSRN Electronic Journal
DOI 10.2139/ssrn.4360052
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Introduces ChatGPT and discusses the academic integrity implications and concerns raised by researchers and educational institutions and the importance of rethinking learning assessment approaches and strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.4360052

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overreliance on ChatGPT to complete daily assignments may have a harmful impact on the development of students' fundamental capacities, such as critical thinking skills, problem-solving skills, imagination, and research abilities.

    “Sok and Heng (2023) argue that the overreliance on ChatGPT to complete daily assignments may have a harmful impact on the development of students' fundamental capacities, such as critical thinking skills (Kasneci et al., 2023;Mhlanga, 2023;Shiri, 2023), problem-solving skills (Kasneci et al., 2023), imagination, and research abilities (Shiri, 2023).”

    From ChatGPT and the Technology-Education Tension: Applying Contextual Virtue Epistemology to a Cognitive Artifact (2024) · cites this paper as Shiri, 2023

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shiri, A.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Shiri, Ali
ORCID
Shiri, Ali
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2139/ssrn.4360052
OpenAlex
W6940474855
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
ChatGPT, academic integrity, generative AI, academic dishonesty, artificial intelligence in education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review