How Do Consumers Use ESG Disclosure? Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment with Everyday Product Purchases
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.jacceco.2025.101811
Abstract
We combine a large-scale field experiment with a customized survey to study how consumers use and respond to ESG disclosure. In a sample of over 24,000 U.S. households, we first establish that while consumers moderately prefer to purchase from ESG-responsible firms, they rarely consult corporate reporting directly and face various frictions in learning about firm-level activities. In our field experiment, we then inform households about real firm-disclosed activities through several randomized information treatments. Consumers increase their purchase intent when exogenously presented with positive signals about environmental, social, and—to a lesser extent—governance activities. Full ESG reports increase purchase intentions only for consumers who choose to view them. After the experiment, consumers increase their actual purchases, but these effects are small, short-lived, and only materialize for social signals and viewed ESG reports. Through a follow-up survey, we provide explanations for why consumers (do not) change their behavior after our experiment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 109 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Leonelli, S., Muhn, M., Rauter, T., & Sran, G.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Leonelli, Sinja
- Muhn, Maximilian
- Rauter, Thomas
- Sran, Gurpal
- Venue
- Journal of Accounting and Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101811-101811
- ISSN
- 0165-4101 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4412872470
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 109
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6
- FWCI
- 17.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Accounting and Economics (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- International Business Machines Corporation
- University of Chicago (IRB22-1687)
- Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main
- Universität Mannheim
- Booth School of Business, University of Chicago (AEARCTR-0010774)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- ESG disclosure, corporate sustainability reporting, consumer purchase behavior, purchase intention, information use, environmental cues, social signals, corporate governance, ESG reports, information frictions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review