Coca-Based Local Growth and Its Socio-Economic Impact in Colombia
Open accessAbstract
This study investigates the socio-economic effects of Colombia’s recent coca cultivation boom, exploiting municipal variations in production incentives following the 2014 announcement of the coca crop substitution program. Using a difference-in-differences strategy with satellite-derived night-time light data as a proxy for economic activity, we find that a one standard deviation increase in coca crops resulted in a 2.5% to 3.1% increase in municipality-level GDP. We also estimate local GDP multipliers, showing that each additional dollar from coca leaf and coca base sales raises GDP by $1.17 to $2.30 and $0.86 to $1.63, respectively. Although the coca boom did not significantly affect local fiscal revenues, violence indicators, or land used for agricultural production, it had substantial environmental impacts, with deforestation rates increasing by 104% and a 302% rise in land conversion from coca cultivation to cattle pastures in the Colombian Amazon. Our findings underscore the significance of illicit economies in providing short-term economic gains and acting as catalysts for economic activity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The surge in pasture conversion after the 2016 peace accord is tightly linked to regions formerly dominated by armed groups, with a 302% rise in land shifted from coca to cattle pastures in Amazon municipalities.
“Remote-sensing analyses reveal that cattle-driven deforestation now dwarfs coca-related forest loss, being roughly sixty times greater (Murillo-Sandoval et al., 2022), and that the surge in pasture conversion after the 2016 peace accord is tightly linked to regions formerly dominated by armed groups, with a 302% rise in land shifted from coca to cattle pastures in Amazon municipalities (Marín-Llan”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Marín-Llanes et al., 2024
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bastos Lima, M. G., & López, J. (2026) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107532
- Authors
- Llanes, L. M., Fernández Sierra, M., Vélez, M. A., Martínez-González, E. F., & Murillo-Sandoval, P. J.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Los Andes (CO)
- Corresponding author
- Llanes, Lucas Marín
- ORCID
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4401753128
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia
- Social Sciences › Demography › History and Politics in Latin America
- Keywords
- coca cultivation, illicit economies, local economic growth, nighttime lights, deforestation, land use change, cattle pastures, Colombian Amazon, violence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review