The Double-Edge Sword of AI: Mitigating the Risk and Maximizing the Benefits of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED)
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dependency and over-reliance on AI often leads to passive cognitive behavior that affects students' natural ability to analyze, evaluate, justify and verify information logically.
“This state of dependency and over reliance often leads to passive cognitive behavior which affects the student's natural ability to analyze, evaluate, justify and verify the information logically (Asuncion & Natividad, 2025).”
From The Double-Edged Sword of Automation: Impact of Generative AI Adoption on Student's Critical Thinking Skills in Higher Education Considering Cognitive Offloading as a Mediator (2026) · cites this paper as Asuncion & Natividad, 2025
Cites
Artificial intelligence in service
Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2018) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670517752459 · Cited by 3,978 · see citing works
Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework
Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1 · Cited by 1,437 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence trends in education: a narrative overview
Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233 · Cited by 956 · see citing works
Kim, J., Lee, H., & Cho, Y. H. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10831-6 · Cited by 669 · see citing works
Towards artificial intelligence-based assessment systems
Luckin, R. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-016-0028 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Lee, S. J., & Kwon, K. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100211 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Ramaila, S., & Molwele, A. J. (2022) · International Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v11n5p9 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jaffar, Z. F., Alvi, A., Rahim, A., Ambreen, S., & Jaffar, M. M. (2026) · Journal of Language, Literature & Social Affairs · doi:10.63056/jllsa.2.5.2026.253
- Authors
- Asuncion, I., & Natividad, L.
- Affiliations
- Central Luzon State University (PH)
- Corresponding author
- Asuncion, Ivy
- ORCID
- Natividad, Lexter
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4408017434
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, benefits and risks of AI, personalized learning, student engagement, data privacy, algorithmic bias, critical thinking skills, TPACK, technology integration in teaching, stakeholder collaboration, educational technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
