CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 9Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and RegulationLaw, AI, and Intellectual Property

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Open-Source AI made in the EU: Why it is a Good Idea

Open access
Floridi, Luciano, Buttaboni, Carlotta, Hine, Emmie, Novelli, Claudio, Schroder, Tyler, Shanklin, Grant·2025·Minds and Machines
DOI 10.2139/ssrn.5191372
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.5191372

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Floridi, L., Buttaboni, C., Hine, E., Novelli, C., Schroder, T., & Shanklin, G.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Floridi, Luciano
ORCID
Venue
Minds and Machines
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025
Volume
35
Issue
2
ISSN
0924-6495 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2139/ssrn.5191372
OpenAlex
W4410940517
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Minds and Machines (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Keywords
AI regulation, AI ethics, trustworthy AI, AI factories, EuroHPC

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review